{"id":6911,"date":"2013-03-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-03-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/"},"modified":"2017-06-09T20:25:28","modified_gmt":"2017-06-09T20:25:28","slug":"a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources","status":"publish","type":"articles","link":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/","title":{"rendered":"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources"},"content":{"rendered":"<p BasicParagraph><span 'font-family:\"Calibri\",\"sans-serif\";\ncolor:windowtext'>This article is a follow-up to the piece that appeared in the<br \/>\nNovember issue of <i>Insulation Outlook.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;:120%;text-autospace:\nnone;vertical-align:middle'>The U.S. national elections appeared to have the<br \/>\nexpected, definitive effect on the high-profile Industrial Boiler Maximum<br \/>\nAchievable Control Technology (MACT) regulation. As discussed in November&#8217;s<br \/>\narticle, the regulation&#8217;s two subparts have undergone many changes and much<br \/>\nscrutiny over the past few years. Such controversy delayed the passing of a<br \/>\ndefinitive standard and placed many industrial, commercial, and institutional<br \/>\nfacilities in a considerable amount of confusion.\u00a0 This article will clearly<br \/>\noutline the changes, updates, and final adjustments to the Major and Area<br \/>\nSource Boiler MACT standards.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>On December 20, 2012, the U.S.<br \/>\nEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed the particulars for the Clean<br \/>\nAir Act Boiler MACT standards originally published in March 2011.\u00a0 Throughout<br \/>\n2011 and 2012, the EPA released extensive revisions to the specific National<br \/>\nEmission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs). The standards are<br \/>\ndivided between 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart JJJJJJ for affected area sources (sources<br \/>\nemitting fewer than 10 and\/or 25 tons per year [tpy] of single HAPs and\/or<br \/>\ntotal HAPS, respectively) and 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart DDDDD for major sources<br \/>\n(sources emitting greater than 10 and\/or 25 tpy of single HAPs and\/or total<br \/>\nHAPS, respectively), as defined by the respective air permits of the facilities.<br \/>\nAll of the final adjustments consider facility concerns and employ new<br \/>\ninformation.\u00a0 Both subparts still work toward preserving public health by<br \/>\nmitigating toxic air pollution while achieving more flexibility for facilities.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>The current Boiler MACT standards<br \/>\ndivide facilities&#8217; boilers into subcategories defined by boiler type, capacity,<br \/>\nand fuel type. Based on this information, a source must meet emission limits,<br \/>\nwork practice standards (including tune-ups and energy assessments), and<br \/>\noperating limits; and\/or demonstrate initial\/regular compliance. The facility&#8217;s<br \/>\ndesignation as new or existing also will determine if it is subject to the<br \/>\nvarying work practice standards and requirements. Below are some critical facts<br \/>\nregarding the final adjustments to the Boiler MACT standards published on<br \/>\nDecember 20, 2012, including how they may apply, and what impact they could<br \/>\nhave, for your facility.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'margin-top:13.5pt;:13.0pt;text-autospace:\nnone;vertical-align:middle'><b>Area Source Requirements <\/b><\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;:120%;text-autospace:\nnone;vertical-align:middle'>40 CFR Part 63 Subpart JJJJJJ affects facilities<br \/>\nwith the potential to emit fewer than 10 tpy of any single HAP and\/or fewer<br \/>\nthan 25 tpy of combined HAPs affecting sources with boilers defined as<br \/>\nexisting, new, or reconstructed. A majority of the boilers affected by this<br \/>\nstandard are in the commercial and institutional sectors. It is anticipated that<br \/>\nthe final adjustments to the standard will provide relief to some of the<br \/>\nfacilities fearful of meeting regulatory requirements and deadlines.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>The health benefits have been<br \/>\nresearched and examined methodically by the EPA. Approximate<br \/>\nstandard-associated reduced exposure to fine particles has a health benefit<br \/>\nvalue of $210 million to $520 million by the year 2015. The EPA estimates that<br \/>\nthe cost for the final standard, incorporating the cost expected to be incurred<br \/>\nby industry, will be roughly $490 million per year.\u00a0 The final modifications<br \/>\nwill not raise the standards&#8217; costs but are intended to ultimately decrease the<br \/>\nburden on smaller facilities with boilers.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>Only a small fraction of the<br \/>\nboilers currently operating will be affected by the final adjustments made by<br \/>\nthis subpart. Based on the final adjustments, 1.3 million of the 1.5 million<br \/>\nboilers at area sources will not be subject because they run on natural gas. Of<br \/>\nthe remaining 183,000 boilers, 182,400 require only regular tune-ups and<br \/>\npossibly a one-time energy assessment. The remaining 1 percent of boilers at<br \/>\narea sources will be obliged to meet the more rigorous emissions limits. These<br \/>\nboilers are chiefly coal burning. Due to how little these sources emit, the EPA<br \/>\nis continuing to require work practice\/management practice standards, which<br \/>\ninclude tune-ups for more than 99 percent of area source boilers covered by the<br \/>\nfinal standards. Less than 1 percent of area source boilers will need to meet<br \/>\nnumerical emission limits.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>Some of the changes from the<br \/>\nMarch 2011 regulation that have been made to the final standards will please<br \/>\nboth the agencies and the affected sources. A point-by-point list of the<br \/>\ncritical changes to the standards as supplied by the EPA in its Technical Fact<br \/>\nSheet is available at\u00a0 <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_boilers_area_recon_fs.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_boilers_area_recon_fs.pdf<\/a><\/i>,<br \/>\nsummarized below.<\/p>\n<p><UL><br \/>\n<LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Extending by 2 years the initial compliance date for existing area<br \/>\nsource boilers subject to the tune-up requirement. Now, existing area source<br \/>\nboilers will have until March 21, 2014 to comply with these standards. If<br \/>\nnecessary, they may request an additional year.\u00a0 This provides facilities with<br \/>\n2 additional years to meet the requirements.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Revising the deadline for initial notification for existing area source<br \/>\nboilers to no later than January 20, 2014.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Revising provisions for existing dual-fuel fired units that fuel switch<br \/>\nfrom gas to coal, biomass, or oil, such that they still would be considered<br \/>\nexisting sources.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Providing subcategories for seasonally operated boilers and limited-use<br \/>\nboilers.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Requiring tune-ups every 5 years, instead of every 2 years, for certain<br \/>\narea source boilers: seasonally operated units, limited-use units, small<br \/>\noil-fired units, and units with oxygen trim systems.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Clarifying that temporary boilers and residential boilers are not part<br \/>\nof the source categories being regulated.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Revising particulate matter (PM) emission limit requirements such that<br \/>\ncombustion of oil meeting certain sulfur content requirements by new oil-fired<br \/>\nboilers is considered an alternative method of meeting the PM emission<br \/>\nstandard, and such units are not required to meet the PM emission limit.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Reducing the fuel sampling and performance testing requirements such<br \/>\nthat after demonstration of initial compliance, under certain circumstances,<br \/>\nfurther fuel sampling for boilers subject to a mercury emission limit, and<br \/>\nfurther PM performance testing for boilers subject to a PM emission limit, are<br \/>\nnot required.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Providing the option of continuous emissions monitoring to demonstrate<br \/>\ncontinuous compliance with the carbon monoxide (CO) emission limit.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI><br \/>\n<\/span>Defining more clearly the scope of the energy assessment and allowing<br \/>\nfor more streamlined assessments, including allowing sources already operating<br \/>\nunder certain energy management programs to satisfy the assessment requirement.<\/LI><br \/>\n<\/UL><\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>Final adjustments to the rule<br \/>\nhave taken many factors into consideration, including concerns raised by the<br \/>\nsources. These rules have made the breakdown of subjectivity more complex than<br \/>\nin the March 2011 standard. To best understand what work practice standards<br \/>\nyour facility is subject to, review figures 1 and 2, which provide a basic<br \/>\noverview of what needs to be completed to meet the area source standard for<br \/>\nboilers under the final adjustments. Please note several changes from the<br \/>\ntables published previously.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>The final rule for area source<br \/>\nboilers is available on the EPA website.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'margin-top:13.5pt;:13.0pt;text-autospace:\nnone;vertical-align:middle'><b>Major Source Requirements<\/b><\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;:120%;text-autospace:\nnone;vertical-align:middle'>40 CFR Part 63 Subpart DDDDD affects facilities<br \/>\nwith the potential to emit greater than or equal to 10 tpy of any single HAP,<br \/>\nand\/or greater than or equal to 25 tpy of combined HAPs. This rule includes<br \/>\nboilers and process heaters burning natural gas, fuel oil, coal, biomass (e.g.,<br \/>\nwood), refinery gas, or other gas to produce steam. Unlike Subpart JJJJJJ,<br \/>\nSubpart DDDDD also includes natural gas\/propane\/clean fuel boilers. These<br \/>\nrequirements contain subcategories with very specific requirements.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'><span 'letter-spacing:\n-.1pt'>Similar to the March 2011 rule, of the roughly 14,000 major source<br \/>\nboilers and process heaters in the United States, 88 percent are required to<br \/>\nconduct annual or biennial tune-ups, and 12 percent are required to meet<br \/>\nemission standards if those standards are not already met. The final adjusted<br \/>\nstandards will be considered effective upon their publication in the Federal<br \/>\nRegister. As with the area source requirements, existing sources will have 3<br \/>\nyears from the publication date to comply with the revised standards. If<br \/>\nneeded, an additional year can be requested.<\/span><\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'><span 'letter-spacing:\n-.05pt'>For the major source standard, the annual cost, including industry<br \/>\ncosts, to implement the standards is estimated to be between $1.4 and $1.6<br \/>\nbillion. Overall, though, the costs to comply per boiler are anticipated to<br \/>\ndrop from those associated with the March 2011 standards. This is due to<br \/>\nalterations made to emission limits based on research, which include less<br \/>\nstrict obligations for the control of particle pollution on biomass units.<br \/>\nFigure 1 from the EPA standard provides extensive summary costs and benefits<br \/>\nassociated with the Major Source Boiler MACT reconsideration for 2015.<\/span><\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>Here is a point-by-point list<br \/>\nof the critical changes to the initial March 2011 standards as supplied by the<br \/>\nEPA in its Technical Fact Sheet:<\/p>\n<p><UL><br \/>\n<LI>Adding new subcategories for light and heavy industrial liquids to<br \/>\nreflect design differences in the boilers that burn these fuels.\u00a0 <\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI>Adding new emission limits for PM that are different for each biomass<br \/>\nfuel subcategory, to better reflect emissions during real-world operating<br \/>\nconditions.\u00a0 <\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI>Adding new emission limits for CO based on newly submitted data that<br \/>\nshows CO emissions from boilers vary greatly. The EPA is setting new limits to<br \/>\nmore adequately capture that variability.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI>Allowing alternative total selective metals emission limits to regulate<br \/>\nmetallic air toxins instead of using a PM as a surrogate, thus allowing more<br \/>\nflexibility and decreasing compliance costs for units that emit low levels of<br \/>\nHAP metals.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI>Replacing numeric dioxin emission limits with work practice standards to<br \/>\nreflect a more robust analysis that shows dioxin emissions are below levels<br \/>\nthat can be accurately measured.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI>Increasing flexibility in compliance monitoring by adding alternative<br \/>\nmonitoring approaches for demonstrating continuous compliance with the PM<br \/>\nlimit.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI>Adjusting PM and CO emission limits for units located outside the<br \/>\nContinental United States, to reflect new data and better reflect the unique<br \/>\noperating conditions associated with operating these units.<\/LI><\/p>\n<p><LI>Continuing to allow units burning clean gases to qualify for work<br \/>\npractice standards instead of numeric emission limits. The EPA is removing the<br \/>\nhydrogen sulfide (H<sub>2<\/sub>S) fuel specification from the rule because it<br \/>\ndoes not provide a direct indication of potential HAP from combustion of<br \/>\ngaseous fuel. Instead, mercury content alone is used to determine clean gas.<\/LI><br \/>\n<\/UL><\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>To best understand what<br \/>\nstandards your major source facility may be subject to, review the major source<br \/>\nstandard for boilers under the final adjustments. Again, please note several<br \/>\nchanges from the tables published previously. There also are many nuanced<br \/>\nvariations based on fuel type and limit specifics that are not included on the<br \/>\ntable. The one major change to this subpart is that new boilers are no longer<br \/>\nsubject to a one-time energy assessment. All existing boilers and process<br \/>\nheaters at a major source facility, however, still must conduct a one-time<br \/>\nenergy assessment for compliance. Please review the actual regulation for<br \/>\nspecifics (see <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_boilers_major.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_boilers_major.pdf<\/a><\/i>).<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;text-indent:13.5pt;:\n120%;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle'>There are many intricacies to<br \/>\nthese regulations, and the final adjustments-particularly for the major source<br \/>\nstandard-are far too detailed to examine here. Further reading is recommended.<\/p>\n<p MsoNormal 'text-align:justify;:120%;text-autospace:\nnone;vertical-align:middle'><span 'font-size:9.0pt;:120%'>Sources<br \/>\nfor Further Reading:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><UL><br \/>\n<LI>National Emission Standards for<br \/>\nHazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and<br \/>\nInstitutional Boilers and Process Heaters (<i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_boilers_major.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_boilers_major.pdf<\/a><\/i>)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><LI>National Emission Standards for<br \/>\nHazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and<br \/>\nInstitutional Boilers (<i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_neshap_ici_boilers_fin.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_neshap_ici_boilers_fin.pdf<\/a><\/i>)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><LI>EPA&#8217;s Air Toxics Standards Major and<br \/>\nArea Source Boilers and Certain Incinerators\u00a0 Technical Overview:\u00a0 Adjustments<br \/>\nfrom March 2011 Final Standards (<i><a href=\"www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_tech_overview_boiler_ciswi_fs.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">www.epa.gov\/airquality\/combustion\/docs\/20121221_tech_overview_boiler_ciswi_fs.pdf<\/a><\/i>)<\/span><\/LI><br \/>\n<\/UL><\/p>\n<div id=\"images\">\n<div class=\"figure\"><a href=\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg\"\/><\/a><b>Figure 1<\/b><\/div>\n<div class=\"figure\"><a href=\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_02.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_02.jpg\"\/><\/a><b>Figure 2<\/b><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This article is a follow-up to the piece that appeared in the November issue of Insulation Outlook. The U.S. national elections appeared to have the expected, definitive effect on the high-profile Industrial Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) regulation. As discussed in November&#8217;s article, the regulation&#8217;s two subparts have undergone many changes and much scrutiny<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":[],"featured_media":0,"template":"","categories":[34,43,292,41,21,29,290,302,28],"class_list":["post-6911","articles","type-articles","status-publish","hentry","category-industrial","category-technology","category-refractory","category-process-control","category-business-managment","category-environmental-control","category-emissivity","category-economy","category-energy-savings"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.0 (Yoast SEO v24.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources - Insulation Outlook Magazine<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This article is a follow-up to the piece that appeared in the November issue of Insulation Outlook. The U.S. national elections appeared to have the expected, definitive effect on the high-profile Industrial Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) regulation. As discussed in November&#8217;s article, the regulation&#8217;s two subparts have undergone many changes and much scrutiny\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Insulation Outlook Magazine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-09T20:25:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/\",\"name\":\"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources - Insulation Outlook Magazine\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-03-01T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-09T20:25:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/\",\"name\":\"Insulation Outlook Magazine\",\"description\":\"The only global magazine dedicated to insulation.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#organization\",\"name\":\"National Insulation Association\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/insulation-outlook-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/insulation-outlook-logo.png\",\"width\":229,\"height\":90,\"caption\":\"National Insulation Association\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources - Insulation Outlook Magazine","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources","og_description":"This article is a follow-up to the piece that appeared in the November issue of Insulation Outlook. The U.S. national elections appeared to have the expected, definitive effect on the high-profile Industrial Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) regulation. As discussed in November&#8217;s article, the regulation&#8217;s two subparts have undergone many changes and much scrutiny","og_url":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/","og_site_name":"Insulation Outlook Magazine","article_modified_time":"2017-06-09T20:25:28+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/","url":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/","name":"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources - Insulation Outlook Magazine","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg","datePublished":"2013-03-01T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-09T20:25:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/IO130302_01.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/articles\/a-further-understanding-of-boiler-mact-for-area-and-major-sources\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Further Understanding of Boiler MACT for Area and Major Sources"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#website","url":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/","name":"Insulation Outlook Magazine","description":"The only global magazine dedicated to insulation.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#organization","name":"National Insulation Association","url":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/insulation-outlook-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2016\/10\/insulation-outlook-logo.png","width":229,"height":90,"caption":"National Insulation Association"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles\/6911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/articles"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6911"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/insulation.org\/io\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/author?post=6911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}