Industrial Insulation Specifications: What Needs to Happen, Why It Matters, and Who Should Care

Bob Bunn

Bob Bunn is a Regional Technical Manager for Johns Manville’s Industrial Insulation Group (www.jm.com) and provides product application technical support and training to facility owners, engineers, contractors, and distributors throughout the eastern half of the United States and Canada. Over the past 40 years, Bob has held leadership positions in engineering, manufacturing, sales, and distribution across the residential, commercial, and industrial insulation markets. Over the past several years, Bob has driven product specifications at the facility and engineering levels and has successfully created demand for Johns Manville’s portfolio of high temperature industrial insulation products and accessories. He can be reached at Bob.Bunn@jm.com.

November 1, 2018

Industrial insulation specifications are the result of copious notes, research, and specifications that are refined over time and compiled into documents. These documents are then shared with the prominent stakeholders in industrial facility construction and maintenance projects. They are a necessary component of most, if not all, industrial process and equipment designs. Even so, it is not uncommon to encounter specifications that are 10 to 15 years old (or older) at large, well-respected engineering firms or industrial facilities. In many situations, these specifications haven’t been dusted off during that time to see if the content is still accurate and up to date. There are a number of reasons why this happens: sometimes no one is assigned the responsibility of maintaining the specifications when there is employee turnover or staffing reductions, or a person who has been the designated “spec expert” retires and no one is given the task of maintaining the specifications.

So, year after year, the specifications remain filed away and fail to be updated because of a popular misconception that the industry hasn’t changed much. After all, we are still using the same insulation that we have been using for decades, right? So why create unnecessary work to update the specifications?

The reason is simple: the industry has changed, and both new and old products are constantly evolving to meet the growing and changing demands of the industry. We often see new products introduced to the market that may be more thermally efficient, can save money, provide safer work environments for employees, are thinner and lighter weight, or can lower the cost of other system components, among other benefits.

When you fail to update your specifications, then you are assuming (perhaps incorrectly) that the current insulation that you use and specify ensures that your processes are running at optimum efficiency, that your employees are operating in the safest of conditions, and that you have saved all the money that you can possibly save. In view of the potential risks and opportunities lost by not updating your specifications, the better approach is to recognize that change is inevitable and constant. As such, you should prioritize the continuous update of your specifications.

The data that goes into insulation specifications is a form of communication between the manufacturers, engineers, specifiers, estimators, distributors, facility owners, contractors, and end users. Each of these function groups needs to know the most up-to-date and accurate data in order to make informed decisions in their areas of responsibility. In order for employees to be effective, they must be keenly aware of the latest trends and products, know the options they have to minimize both short-term and long-term costs, and have this information readily available to them.

When given an opportunity to write a new specification—or ideally, review and update an existing insulation specification—it’s important to understand the end goal or what the customer/client/engineering firm is looking to accomplish by sponsoring a review of their specifications. Is it simply to add new product information, or is it an exercise in reviewing every aspect of the specification to ensure ultimate accuracy? If given the option to choose, we recommend a complete review of the entire specification to determine ways to improve upon the core document. It should be determined if there is a better or easier format to use, if products or manufacturers that are listed still exist, whether the product formulations, names, and references are the same, whether the manufacturer was purchased and the products are now being produced by a new owner, and more. There are a myriad of changes or updates that can and should be made, and this exercise can take weeks or even months, depending on the complexity and breadth of insulation products being considered. It is this time commitment that can easily derail the best of intentions to get specification manuals updated.

This is where having a third-party resource can benefit an organization that chooses to form a knowledgeable and capable team to engage in a specification update. Ultimately, utilizing the assistance of an outside party may be a better option than trying to use internal personnel, who may get pulled off the project to work on more time-sensitive projects.

Maintaining up-to-date specifications for industrial products is an absolute necessity in order to ensure that facility owners, engineers, and contractors are on the same page regarding the choices to be made across the many insulation options that are available. Choosing the right insulation material for the application being considered can be a daunting task at times, especially when considering thermal properties, compressive strength, corrosion under insulation (CUI), moisture absorption or resistance, surface burning characteristics, etc. By being proactive and updating your industrial insulation specifications, you will have a much more accurate tool to efficiently approach optimized system design. These current specifications will provide the appropriate technical information to allow facility owners, engineers, and contractors to make well-informed decisions regarding which insulation to specify on a job. This will ultimately contribute favorably toward optimizing process efficiencies, providing personnel protection, conserving energy, and reducing the carbon footprint of the facility.

 

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the November 2018 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2018 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

Related Articles

A Guide to Building Commissioning

Energy efficiency has become the highest priority for everyone involved in construction or building—from those at the highest level of government to construction professionals working at the ground level—because it can alleviate major issues by lessening environmental impact, saving money, and optimizing performance. A popular and effective route to increased efficiency is building commissioning. According

Read Article

Building the Future: Recommendations from the NIBS Consultative Council

In its 2010 Annual Report to the President of the United States, the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) addressed several high-level issues currently impacting the building community and offered findings and recommendations related to these issues. The National Insulation Association currently serves as the vice-chair of the NIBS Consultative Council, which represents leading organizations

Read Article

Energy Codes 101: What Are They and What Is DOE’s Role?

Building codes are state laws. The United States does not have a national building code or energy code; instead, states or local governments can choose to adopt one of the national model energy codes, a modified version of the model code, or their own state-specific code. Here are the 3 key primary components of the energy codes process and DOE’s role within them.

Read Article

Advice from the Field: What Insulation Professionals Wish You Knew

We asked several National Insulation Association industry leaders what design issues they face and what information that they would like engineers, system designers, and specifiers to know. Their responses are below. Steve Luse is the fourth-generation CEO of Luse Thermal Technologies (www.luse.com), a NIA Union Contractor member company founded in 1923, and a multifaceted construction,

Read Article