Category Archives: Global

AIA: Even with Uncertainties Looming, Healthy Gains Projected for 2017 Building Activity

By Kermit Baker

2016 was a chaotic year for non-residential building activity. For most serving this market, it turned out to be a successful year—construction spending in this sector rose almost 8%, according to current estimates—even as challenges to the industry were continually emerging. Construction labor remains a major concern. Virtually every segment of the design and construction market is reporting that recruiting and retaining qualified staff is a growing issue. Many workers left the industry during the downturn, and others left the workforce entirely. Rebuilding a competent and productive workforce is a challenge, particularly when the national unemployment rate is below 5%.

The decade-long decline in interest rates is coming to an end. Long-term rates have been edging up in recent months, and the Federal Reserve Board’s hike in short-term interest rates in December is likely to be matched by another 2 to 3 increases this year. Many feel that this current economic cycle is well past its prime, so a recession watch remains. While the imminent threat of a national economic recession seems modest, most analysts have it in the back of their minds and each new economic threat will be viewed in this context.

However, entering 2017, the industry is looking forward to another couple of years of healthy growth. The economy in general is doing well, with healthy job growth, rising wages, low interest rates, and very strong levels of business and consumer confidence. Construction levels surprised many on the upside this past year, particularly for most commercial categories. According to current estimates, spending on offices increased more than 20% in 2016, hotel spending was up about 25%, and even retail and other commercial facilities saw growth of about 10%. Industrial construction was weak, as expected. Institutional project activity was somewhat disappointing, particularly for health-care facilities.

For the coming year, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) Consensus Forecast panelists are projecting growth in overall non-residential building spending of almost 6%, virtually identical to their projection from mid-year 2016. Commercial construction activity is expected to increase in excess of 8% this year, which is slightly above the projection from mid-2016. Industrial construction looks to remain essentially flat at 2016 levels, below the growth expected as of the last forecast. Institutional construction is projected to grow at an almost 6% pace, largely unchanged from last summer’s consensus.

The Consensus Forecast panel sees the construction cycle continuing to ease moving into 2018. Overall building spending should increase by about 5% that year, with the commercial and industrial sectors growing at a slower rate than the overall building sector. Institutional building activity will pick up some of the slack, growing nearly 6%. Educational facilities are expected to see healthy gains, and even health-care spending is projected to be fairly strong.

How the New Administration’s Potential Policies May Impact Construction

The general uncertainty surrounding the construction outlook has been heightened by new policy directions being proposed by the Trump administration. Many of these policy discussions are not yet sufficiently developed to project specific implications, but there is a long list of issue areas that may have an impact.

•     Infrastructure investment: The infrastructure investment proposal is the one area under discussion that has the greatest direct impact on the construction industry. With national construction spending currently running at about a $1.2 trillion a year pace, this proposal to increase spending by up to $1 trillion over the coming decade would have a dramatic impact on the industry. In all likelihood, buildings would not be much of a focus for most of these projects. However, the additional demand for labor and materials would put pressure on an already stressed industry.
•     Repeal and replace Obamacare: Health-care accounts for about 10% of building spending nationally, so major changes to the health-care system, or even uncertainty surrounding the possibility of major changes, could have significant impacts on building construction levels.
•     Roll back governmental regulations: A widely cited study by the National Association of Home Builders concludes that, on average, regulations imposed by government at all levels account for 25% of the final price of a new single-family home built for sale. While the federal government has limited ability to influence state and local regulations, initiatives to reduce government’s involvement in the private sector construction process would likely streamline the design and construction process.
•     Tax reform: Trump administration proposals for simplifying and potentially reducing tax burdens are likely to have disproportionate benefits to the corporate sector and upper-income individuals. This would likely increase the availability of capital for investment, thereby increasing commercial and industrial construction, at least in the short term.
•     Trade: Restricting trade would likely increase prices of imported construction products. For construction product manufacturers, those relying on exports could see reduced demand, as our trading partners may decide to match any U.S. restrictions on their goods. Those with import competition might see increased demand, as tariffs or restrictions likely would raise prices on these imported goods.
•     Immigration: Construction is one of the U.S. industries that is most reliant on immigration for its workforce. Limiting immigration could exacerbate an already serious labor problem in the industry.
•     Financial deregulation: Rolling back Dodd-Frank provisions would increase the availability capital for mortgage, real estate, and construction loans. Privatizing government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could reduce lending to the residential sector.
•     Energy policy: Efforts to make the United States energy independent would unleash programs to boost fossil-fuel production. Incentives to encourage the development of renewable energy sources and promote sustainable design and construction would likely be significantly reduced with these programs.

While few of the proposals around these ideas directly affect construction, most have at least some potential impact on the industry. Some would generate more construction activity, and others less. Monitoring progress along these agenda items will help to assess how construction will fare in the coming years.

Encouraging Outlook for Construction

The prospects for the construction sector for this year and next remain quite positive. Even with all the challenges facing the industry, the expectations are that construction spending will outperform the broader economy this year and next. The AIA’s Architecture Billings Index (ABI), an accurate indicator of construction activity that leads spending in the non-residential sector by 9 to 12 months, moved up sharply in December. Firms with a commercial/industrial, as well as those with an institutional specialization, reported the strongest growth of the year in December, once seasonal adjustments are applied. New design work is coming into architectural firms at a healthy pace, and firm backlogs are at sound levels, so the industry has a lot of momentum heading into 2017.

Still, it is clear that the industry is on the down side of this construction cycle, meaning the growth rates will slow in the coming quarters. The commercial sector is typically the first building sector to see a slowdown, and that is expected to be the case again this time, with growth in construction spending on commercial buildings projected to fall from about 17% last year to 8% this year to just over 4% in 2018. Institutional construction will offset some of this slower growth, with spending growth of about 4.5% last year rising to around 6% this year and next. However, being this late in the cycle, the industry is more vulnerable to external disruptions, and the list of possibilities in this category is very long at present.

Kermit Baker, Hon. AIA, is the AIA’s Chief Economist and part of the AIA Economics and Market Research Group, which provides AIA members with insights and analysis of the economic factors that shape the business of architecture. Reprinted with permission from AIA, January 25, 2017, www.aia.org.


FMI: Failing When Times Are Good

As we like to say, “Contractors don’t starve to death; they die from gluttony.” In other words, contractors don’t fail for want of work or because times are tough. They fail because they get too much work, too fast, with inadequate resources, and then they get into financial trouble and run out of cash.

In light of today’s severe labor shortages, this problem becomes particularly acute in an environment where demand is expected to accelerate in one or more sectors of the economy (i.e., a focus on infrastructure). Furthermore, consider the fact that between 2009 and 2015, the average number of months of contractor backlogs (for all types of contractors) increased by 33%. At the same time, contractor margins are now tighter, contractual conditions and projects more complex, and 1.5 million fewer construction workers remain in the industry (compared to pre-recession levels). All this to say: Think twice before you introduce more risk variables by abandoning your core markets.

As we move further into 2017, we caution E&C firms to be wary when chasing down new work opportunities. Even though it’s a natural inclination, this strategy can ultimately lead to greater levels of insolvency, bankruptcy, and other issues for the industry. It’s almost inevitable that companies will get ahead of themselves and spend their balance sheets chasing dreams, news, and promises. To avoid these traps, companies need to focus on the facts and business fundamentals and keep their eye on the ball. Know the markets that you’re going into, the lines of business that you’re taking on, or the vertical sectors that you’re exploring—particularly if these are new to you.

“The dollars that are tied to the construction industry recently exceeded $1 trillion and are increasing. And the variance is narrowing between the percentage of GDP attributed to construction in relation to the general economy. In other words, the rate of increase for construction—which was lower up until a few years ago—is now aligned with that of the general economy. Thus, we’re seeing the convergence of construction returning to normal for the first time since 2007, while at the same time, the unemployment rate is dropping. So right now, nearly all of our clients are reporting increased business backlogs—they have more business than they even know what to do with—and their greatest challenge is the inability to procure labor to handle those projects.” —Sal DiFonzo, Managing Director FMI Compensation

Excerpted with permission from FMI’s report, “U.S. Markets Construction Overview 2017.” The full report is available at https://tinyurl.com/zf45tzu.


ABC: Construction Input Prices Surge to Start 2017

Construction input prices collectively rose by 1% on a monthly basis and 3.8% on a year-over-year basis, according to analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics data released by Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC). This represents the fastest year-over-year rate of materials price inflation since the beginning of 2012. Nonresidential input prices rose 0.9% for the month and are up 4% year over year.

The rise in input prices is largely attributable to natural gas prices, which expanded 23.6% for the month and are up 81.8% year over year. Crude petroleum prices slipped 5.5% for the month, but are up 77.5% for the year.

“Despite a still-strong U.S. dollar, input prices have continued to rise in recent weeks,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu. “There are a number of factors at work, including some evidence that global demand for various materials has begun to firm, including in China. Chinese economic growth was solid last year and ended 2016 on a strong note. There are also indications that U.S. economic growth is set to accelerate due in part to an expected pickup in business investment.

“While demand has been firming, certain suppliers have been taking active steps to suppress supply,” said Basu. “OPEC reached an agreement late last year to curb output, helping to bring oil prices above $50/barrel, where they have remained. Concerns regarding trade wars and tariffs may have also helped to push commodity prices higher.

“The question is whether these forces will continue to dominate,” said Basu. “They may not, as natural gas prices have been falling for much of February, perhaps the result of seasonality. U.S. oil production appears set to rise in the context of higher prices, which could also help to lower prices. Finally, the global economic outlook remains shaky despite relatively upbeat near-term projections for the U.S. economy.”

This release from Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., can be accessed online at https://tinyurl.com/huqx59x.


ENR: 2017 Forecast: A Weak Recovery Will Gain Strength

Trump’s unexpected election is having little impact on next year’s construction market forecasts: The fundamentals are strong and already in place. The year to watch is 2018.

By Tim Grogan and Bruce Buckley

The ink barely had dried on this year’s batch of construction market forecasts when economists had to take a second look at their numbers to evaluate the impact of Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election, which brought with it a Republican-controlled Senate and House. Most economists are holding firm to their initial forecasts, saying it is too early to sort out all the variables.

Dodge Data & Analytics is forecasting construction starts to increase 5.4% in 2017, after seeing growth fall to 1.3% this year. FMI Corp. predicts that construction put-in-place will grow another 3.9% next year, following this year’s 4.9% increase. The Portland Cement Association’s (PCA’s) forecast looks for a 3.5% increase in construction put-in-place, a slight boost over the 3.1% growth PCA estimates for this year. The National Association of Home Builders is calling for single-family housing starts to jump 12.3% in 2017 at the same time the multifamily housing starts cool off. The transportation association, ARTBA, expects to see the strong growth in some states canceled out by weakness in others.

On the downside, the election does carry some risks, says Ed Sullivan, Chief Economist with PCA. “No decision-maker likes uncertainty. Trump could have an adverse effect on overall economic activity next year, which, in turn, could affect construction activity,” Sullivan notes.

Upside from Bond Measures

On the upside, voters passed billions of dollars in construction-related bonds, which should brighten next year’s outlook, says Robert Murray, Chief Economist for Dodge. “Trump offered a wide range of proposals… but the specifics are still to come,” he says.

“Of the various proposals, there are 3 that are relatively safe to say will have some near-term impact on construction,” Murray says. He thinks Trump’s pledge to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act will have a negative impact on health-care construction. Dodge was predicting that starts for new health-care facilities would increase 7% in 2017. This potential uptick could be balanced by an increase in infrastructure spending as Trump tries to make good on his promise to create jobs. Finally, Trump’s call to “lift Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital energy infrastructure projects to move forward” could help to revitalize a sector that hit a brick wall in 2016, Murray says.

Dodge is forecasting increases between 5% and 8% for most non-building construction markets in 2017. The major exception is a 29% decline projected for the electric utility market, a dip that would follow this year’s estimated 26% drop.

The energy market is coming off a string of large multibillion-dollar, energy-related projects, mostly in the Gulf Coast area, in 2015 and early this year, says Murray. However, the market could not sustain that momentum, and the result was double-digit percentage declines.

If the electric utility and gas terminal projects were excluded from total construction starts, the estimate for 2016 and forecast for 2017 would look very different, says Murray. Excluding this sector, Murray estimates that total construction starts would be up 4% this year instead of 1%. Further, next year’s forecast would be calling for an 8%, instead of 5%, increase in total construction starts.

Market Swell for Offices

The Dodge forecast for the non-residential building markets is fairly optimistic. Murray estimates that office-building starts will increase 18% this year, after a weak 2015. He predicts that growth will continue, with another 9% increase in 2017. “Hotel construction has probably reached its peak with this year’s estimated 25% increase in starts,” Murray says. He forecast the hotel market to grow just another 1% next year.

On the other hand, “further declines in vacancies indicate that neither warehouses nor offices are facing an immediate imbalance of supply versus demand,” Murray says. He forecasts that, overall, the commercial markets will grow about 6% in 2017.

ARTBA is calling for a relatively flat highway-and-bridge market next year. “The passage of the FAST (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation) Act and increases in state and local funding will create real growth is some states, while others remain flat or even decline,” says Alison Black, Chief Economist for ARTBA. “The FAST Act does provide much-needed funding stability, but it does not provide a ramp up in real funding that would support market growth in each state.”

FMI also sees continued growth in the overall construction market, although at a slower pace than in recent years. Brian Strawberry, Senior Economist at FMI, notes that many sectors, including residential construction, have seen double-digit growth in recent years, but that pace is not sustainable in the long-term. “We’ve been playing catch-up since the recession,” he says. “Things are settling down now.”

FMI reports that the single-family home market saw double-digit growth in 2012–2015, but it estimates growth will pull back to 6% in 2016, with a total value of $246.9 billion. During that time, the multifamily residential market also was hot but now has cooled. FMI forecasts a 7% rate of growth in 2016. Strawberry says he sees similar growth rates in residential in 2017.

In non-residential, FMI also sees a general cooling of activity, particularly on the private side. “A lot of private projects were in planning and are now underway or completed,” he says. One notable exception is the data-center market. Strawberry expects data-center activity, which has been strong in recent years, to continue at a high level. “There are some very large data-center projects underway, with more in planning,” he says. “That will have an impact on the overall commercial market going forward.”

As private work winds down, Strawberry believes more work in the public markets, such as institutional and infrastructure projects, will start to come on line. “If you look at 2017, 2018, and 2019, you’ll see attractive growth rates in education and health care, with health care going a touch faster than education,” he adds. Strawberry notes that many of the large higher-education projects are sports facilities and related projects. “That ties into economic growth opportunities around those developments,” he says.

PCA’s Ed Sullivan sees solid economic fundamentals in the general economy but a mixed outlook for construction heading into 2017. PCA predicts that GDP will end up at 1.5% this year and 2.4% next year. Unemployment also is likely to remain at or slightly below 5%. In addition, inflation is “not an issue.” The Federal Reserve is “taking its time ramping up interest rates,” he says.

Still, PCA sees the residential market softening in the latter half of 2016. In its summer 2016 forecast update, PCA predicted 6.7% growth in the housing market in 2017 and 2018. However, Sullivan says the market has reached a plateau. “As a result, we haven’t seen some of the growth we expected, even though modest, in starts activity—primarily in single-family homes,” he adds. “That’s a powerful statement because residential is so important in overall construction that it does create a more temperate outlook for this year and next year.” Sullivan adds the caveat, however, that PCA is still its exact forecast numbers.

Meanwhile, non-residential activity remains roughly at the pace that PCA predicted in the spring, Sullivan says. After double-digit growth in non-residential spending in 2014 and 2015, PCA expects growth of less than 5% in 2016. Annual growth could range between 3.0% and 3.5% for the foreseeable future.

Sullivan credits continued job creation as the key driver in non-residential activity. PCA predicts that annual job creation in the U.S. could slow slightly but remain above 2 million per year through 2020. “If 1 in 5 jobs are in an office, that puts pressure on occupancy rates and drives demand,” he adds.

PCA also forecasts increased and sustained government spending, particularly at the state and local levels, as tax revenue generally improves. “It may grow at a modest clip, but it will still grow,” according to Sullivan.

Tim Grogan is the Senior Editor for Engineering News-Record. Bruce Buckley is a freelance writer and photographer based in the Washington, DC, area. Reprinted with permission from www.enr.com.


Dodge Data & Analytics: President Donald Trump Likely to Be a Plus for the Construction Industry

Federal, State, and Local Infrastructure Investment Seen as Set to Grow

The election of Donald J. Trump appears to be a welcome development for the U.S. construction industry, according to forecasters at Dodge Data & Analytics. With his background and experience in construction and real estate development, President Trump understands the important role that construction plays in the growth of our economy and the vitality of our cities.

During the course of their campaigns, both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton highlighted the need for increased federal investment in infrastructure. Under President Trump’s proposal, up to $550 billion in federal funds could be invested, presumably over a 5-year period, in infrastructure and publics works projects.

“The broad proposal for increased federal funding should support the public works sector, either directly or indirectly, by keeping attention focused on the need to upgrade infrastructure,” said Robert Murray, Chief Economist, Dodge Data & Analytics. “The ways in which the Trump proposals will affect construction will become clearer as more details come forth, including how these proposals make their way through Congress. For the moment, it’s still believed that total construction starts in 2017 will increase 5%, with some dampening for health-care related projects accompanied by improvement for public works construction.” President Trump’s emphasis on upgrading and developing public infrastructure, including roads, bridges, airports, transit systems, and ports will, with the approval of the 115th Congress, bring much needed revitalization to U.S. infrastructure and create favorable business conditions across the design and construction industries.

While the specifics of federal infrastructure investment in 2017 and beyond will become clearer in the months ahead, the ideas already proposed should help spur Congressional action on 2 existing legislative items, including the Water Resources Development Act and the 2017 Federal Appropriations Bill, which make provisions for infrastructure spending on water management, transportation, and energy
infrastructure.

The election has also already provided some clarity on likely construction at the state and local level. Voters have given their approval for several major construction-related measures in California, Colorado, Texas, and North Carolina with a combined value upwards of $136 billion for education and transportation sector construction.

This release from Dodge Construction can be accessed online at https://tinyurl.com/zlxck2e.


FMI: U.S. Markets Construction Overview 2017

Construction Forecast

As always, the construction outlook has a mixture of good signs and bad. For instance, the unemployment rate for construction workers is now in line with the unemployment rate for all workers at around 4.5%. There are still many people unemployed who aren’t in the count as job seekers anymore, and that will be a difficult problem to fix as workers are displaced by technologies or employers relocating, growing, downsizing, etc. The construction industry is in the middle of this situation as employers find it difficult to hire skilled workers at the right time and in the right place. Employment, along with the fight for higher/lower wages that goes with it, will continue to be a challenge for the economy:

•     GDP is up.
•     Employment remains high.
•     Wages in the construction industry are up.
•     The Federal Reserve managed to increase the interest rate and expects to have more increases in 2017.
•     The CPI remains low.
•     The price of oil and gas is working its way up again.
•     Consumer confidence is high.

Even considering many good signs that the economy is tracking in the right direction, there are no signs of over-exuberance in the forecast. For construction, FMI expects a 1% increase in construction-put-in-place growth over the 5% in 2016. Our forecast is tempered by many forces, including a downtick in the fourth quarter FMI Nonresidential Construction Index, which dropped just 0.4 points to 56.9. In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Index stood at 59.5. While the trend indicates a slower outlook for non-residential construction, the Index is still solidly in positive territory as it has been since the first quarter of 2012. While most of the economic components of the NRCI slipped lower, backlogs increased from 10 months to 12 months with expectations that backlog growth will continue in the near term. Looking at markets, the outlook continues to be positive for all markets through 2017, but the 3-year outlook is less rosy.

Commercial

The solid growth rate of 8% for commercial construction in 2016 will slow to just 6% in 2017 and drop to around 3% by 2020. The expected slowdown in commercial construction is due more to a change in consumer buying habits than overall spending, which continues to edge higher. The continuing trend to shop online from a smartphone is hurting traditional big-box stores the most. For instance, after the year ended, Sears announced it will close more than 30 Sears and Kmart stores in early 2017. The move from traditional shopping venues will likely result in a merging of online and brick-and-mortar shopping with brick and mortar becoming more of a destination or event-related atmosphere. Some of the fastest-growing areas in commercial retail construction have been drinking places and food services; however, building materials and garden supply stores are currently experiencing the highest growth rate.

Trends

The Department of Commerce reports, “Retail trade sales were virtually unchanged (±0.5%)* from October 2016, and up 3.6% (±0.7%) from last year. Non-store re­tailers were up 11.9% (±1.6%) from November 2015, while health and personal care stores retailers were up 6.2% (±2.5%) from last year” (U.S. Department of Commerce, December 14, 2016).

The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index, reached 113.7 (1985=100) in November. “Consumer Confidence improved further in December, due solely to in­creasing Expectations which hit a 13-year high (Dec. 2003, 107.4),” said Lynn Franco, Director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board. “The post-election surge in optimism for the economy, jobs, and income prospects, as well as for stock prices which reached a 13-year high, was most pronounced among older consumers.” (The Confer­ence Board, December 27, 2016).

The Internet of Things (IoT) will be increasingly disruptive for commercial business, presenting both opportunities for new businesses and threats to traditional brick-and-mortar markets.

Manufacturing

After a busy 2015, manufacturing construction fell 3% in 2016. We expect growth to return to 8% in 2017 to reach nearly $82 billion in construction put in place. This forecast could change depending on the plans of the next Congress and the new president. Currently, at just 74.8 for November 2016, manufacturing capacity utilization has not outpaced added capacity. Increasing energy prices may spur some capacity additions in the oil and gas sector, but price increases haven’t been that stable at this point. The completion of the Panama Canal expansion project is expected to decrease costs and increase shipments from Gulf Coast ports between the U.S. and Asia.

Trends

With little change since last quarter, manufacturing capacity utilization rates are at 74.8 of capacity in November 2016, which is well below the historical average of 78.5 (1972–2015).

The U.S. Department of Commerce reports, “Shipments of manufactured durable goods in November, up 2 of the last 3 months, increased $0.2 billion or 0.1% to $234.2 billion. This followed a 0.1% October decrease” (December 22, 2016).

“New orders for manufactured durable goods in November decreased $11.0 billion or 4.6% to $228.2 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau announced. This decrease, down following 4 consecutive monthly increases, followed a 4.8% October increase. Excluding transportation, new orders increased 0.5%. Excluding de­fense, new orders decreased 6.6%” (U.S. Census Bureau, December 22, 2016).

“The November PMI registered 53.2%, an increase of 1.3 percentage points from the October reading of 51.9%. The New Orders Index registered 53%, an increase of 0.9 percentage point from the October reading of 52.1%” according to The Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®.

Regional Summary

In our regional forecast, the weakest regions in 2017 will be the Middle Atlantic and the West North Central. The Mountain and Pacific regions will both experience double-digit growth. The Mid-Atlantic region will see slower growth in manufacturing, residential, and infrastructure, while growth in the West North Central region is largely dependent on the price of oil, as the low prices continue to hit the oil fields. Residential, commercial, and education construction will be strong in the Pacific region, particularly in California, where housing prices and availability are making it hard to find a place to live near where people work. The Mountain region will continue high growth rates for residential construction and have solid growth for most construction markets in 2017.

Excerpted with permission from FMI’s report, “U.S. Markets Construction Overview 2017.” The full report is available at https://tinyurl.com/zf45tzu.


Zion Research: Global Insulation Market Will Grow at CAGR of around 8.0% between 2015 and 2020

By Caroline Kendrick

Zion Research has published a new report titled “Insulation (Plastic Foam, Mineral Wool, Fiberglass and Others) Market for Residential Buildings, Non-Residential Construction, Industrial, HVAC & OEM and Other Applications: Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Segment, Trends and Forecast, 2014 – 2020.” According to the report, the global insulation market was valued at approximately USD 40.0 billion in 2014 and is expected to reach approximately USD 65.0 billion by 2020, growing at a CAGR of around 8.0% between 2015 and 2020.

Insulation is a method that restricts the transfer of heat and/or electricity. Insulators have the opposite effect on the flow of electrons. The R-value determines the quality of insulator—the higher the R-value, the more effective the insulator. Good insulators such as wood, plastic, rubber, and glass are widely used in different insulation processes. Insulators find widespread applications in a variety of piping and tank projects. Design considerations for insulation often include insulating value, fire safety, resistance to corrosion, and other factors.

The insulation market is segmented on the basis of key products, including plastic foam, mineral wool, fiber glass, and others. Fiber glass was the largest product segment and accounted for over 40% overall market share in 2014. Fiber glass is commonly used in various applications owing to its excellent properties and low cost. Plastic foam is another key product and is expected to witness significant growth in the near future. Plastic foams are mainly consumed in acoustic and thermal insulation in commercial, residential, and industrial application sectors.

Insulators are widely adopted in residential buildings, non-residential construction, industrial, HVAC and original equipment manufacturers (OEM), and others. The insulation market was dominated by the residential buildings segment with over 50% share of the total revenue generated in 2014. The growth of this segment is mainly attributed to increasing urbanization coupled with high disposable income. Non-residential construction, industrial, and HVAC and OEM are other key application segments.
Asia Pacific was largest regional market for insulation and accounts for over 40% share of the total revenue generated in 2014. The insulation market in the Asia Pacific region is expected to exhibit strong growth owing to rising government support and rapid growth in infrastructure. In terms of revenue, North America was the second largest market for insulation.

Some of the key players operating in this market include Duro-Last Roofing, Inc.; The Dow Chemical Company; Owens Corning; Johns Manville; CertainTeed Corporation; Rockwool International A/S; Knauf Gips KG; Atlas Roofing Corporation; and Huntsman Corporation.

Caroline Kendrick is the Senior SEO in Consumer Goods and Research Analyst at Market Research Store. The full report is available at https://tinyurl.com/gkpdrhy.


Dodge Construction Outlook: New Construction Starts in 2017 to Increase 5% to $713 Billion

Dodge Data & Analytics recently released its 2017 Dodge Construction Outlook, a mainstay in construction industry forecasting and business planning. The report predicts that total U.S. construction starts for 2017 will advance 5% to $713 billion, following gains of 11% in 2015 and an estimated 1% in 2016.

“The U.S. construction industry has witnessed signs of deceleration in 2016, following several years of steady growth,” stated Robert Murray, Chief Economist for Dodge Data & Analytics. “Total construction starts during the first half of this year lagged behind what was reported in 2015, raising some concern that the current construction expansion may have run its course. However, the early 2016 shortfall reflected the comparison to unusually elevated activity during the first half of 2015, lifted by 13 very large projects valued each at $1 billion or more, such as a $9 billion liquefied natural gas export terminal in Texas and a $2.5 billion office tower in New York City. As 2016 has proceeded, the year-to-date shortfall has grown smaller, easing concern that the construction industry may be in the early stage of cyclical decline. Instead, the construction industry has now entered a more mature phase of its expansion, one that is characterized by slower rates of growth than what took place during the 2012–2015 period, but still growth. Since the construction start statistics will lead the pattern of construction spending, this means that construction spending can be expected to see moderate gains through 2017 and beyond.”

“On balance, there are a number of positive factors which suggest the construction expansion has room to proceed. The U.S. economy in 2017 is anticipated to see moderate job growth, market fundamentals for commercial real estate should remain generally healthy, and more funding support is coming from state and local bond measures. Although the global economy in 2017 will remain sluggish, energy prices appear to have stabilized, interest rate hikes will be gradual and few, and a new U.S. President will have been elected. For 2017, total construction starts are forecast to rise 5% to $713 billion. Gains of 8% are expected for both residential building and non-residential building, while non-building construction slides a further 3%.”
The pattern of construction starts by more specific sectors is the following:

•     Single-family housing will rise 12% in dollars, corresponding to a 9% increase in units to 795,000 (Dodge basis). Access to home mortgage loans is improving, and some of the caution exercised by potential homebuyers will ease with continued employment growth and low mortgage rates. Older members of the Millennial generation are now moving into the 30 to 35 year-old age bracket, which should begin to lift demand for single-family housing.
•     Multifamily housing will be flat in dollars and down 2% in units to 435,000 (Dodge basis). This project type now appears to have peaked in 2015, lifted in particular by an exceptional amount of activity in the New York, New York, metropolitan area, which is now settling back. Continued growth for multifamily housing in other metropolitan areas, along with still generally healthy market fundamentals, will enable the retreat at the national level to stay gradual.
•     Commercial building will increase 6% on top of the 12% gain estimated for 2016. Office construction is showing improvement from very low levels, lifted by the start of several signature office towers and broad development efforts in downtown markets. Store construction should show some improvement from a very subdued 2016, and warehouses will register further growth. Hotel construction, while still healthy, will begin to retreat after a strong 2016.
•     Institutional building will advance 10%, resuming its expansion after pausing in 2015 and 2016. The educational facilities category is seeing an increasing amount of K–12 school construction, supported by the passage of recent school construction bond measures. More growth is expected for the amusement category (convention centers, sports arenas, casinos) and transportation terminals.
•     Manufacturing plant construction will increase 6%, beginning to recover after steep declines in 2015 and 2016 that reflected the pullback for large petrochemical plant starts.
•     Public works construction will improve 6%, regaining upward momentum after slipping 3% in 2016. Highways and bridges will derive support from the new federal transportation bill, while environmental works should benefit from the expected passage of the Water Resources Development Act. Natural gas and oil pipeline projects are expected to stay close to the volume that’s been present in 2016.
•     Electric utilities and gas plants will fall another 29% after the 26% decline in 2016. The lift that had been present in 2015 from new liquefied natural gas export terminals continues to dissipate. Power plant construction, which was supported in 2016 by the extension of investment tax credits, will ease back as new generating capacity comes on line.

This release from Dodge Construction can be accessed online at https://tinyurl.com/hnkvwck.


AGC: How Technology Is Shaping the Construction Industry

By Autumn Cafiero Giuesti

An industry that remained relatively unchanged for the better part of a century has undergone an unprecedented transformation in the course of just 5 years.
Specialty contractors in particular have been on the front lines of these changes. Some changes have produced positive results, such as a greater emphasis on safety and improved efficiencies through technology and new project delivery methods. But other changes have involved hardships such as labor shortages and increased competition in some regions.

“Over the last decade, we’ve seen 2 things really change the value proposition from our side. One of them is process improvement, and the other is technology,” says Dave Moeller, Director of Customer Markets for Graybar, a St. Louis, Missouri-based electrical supply distributor and member of multiple AGC chapters that works closely with contractors.
As with most industries these days, technology rules the day in terms of progress that’s taking place among specialized contractors.

“Technology has changed every facet of our industry,” says David Gralike, Senior Vice President of Guarantee Electrical in St. Louis, Missouri, an AGC of Missouri and Southern Illinois Builders Association member. “There is nothing we do the same as we did 10 years ago—our marketing approach, estimating procedures, installation, communicating, engineering—all different.”

Contractors are doing far more electronically than they were just a few years ago. Paper blueprints have given way to tablets and laptops capable of producing 3D models of complex building plans. Whereas contractors used to wait days to have a set of drawings shipped before they could get to work, they can now have an entire set of drawings sent hundreds of miles away within a matter of seconds.

“The old adage was you need information, tools, and materials,” says John Hugins, Director of Operations for Accent Electrical Services in Denver, an AGC of Colorado building chapter member. “But the information piece has always been really slow and lagging. It used to just be a call between the project manager and the foreman, and hopefully you caught all the details. Now there are new methods for providing information and accurate updates if things change on the drawings.

One example of this tech shift is Guarantee Electrical’s use of Accubid LiveCount Construction take-off software. The company’s estimators no long work with paper drawings, colored pencils, and clickers. Instead, the estimating staff relies on a set of 3 computer monitors to display Accubid, as well as project drawings and emails. Guarantee Electrical has distributed more than 250 tablets to its supervisors to give them the ability to FaceTime their manager and electronically track employee time and labor records, work orders, and daily logs.

Autumn Cafiero Giusti is an independent writer and editor based in the greater New Orleans area. Excerpted with permission from Constructor, January/February 2017, a publication of the Associated General Contractors of America, https://tinyurl.com/zzmtff2.

 

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the March/April 2017 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2017 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

Economic forecasting is always fraught with perils. Uncertainty about laws and regulations—not to mention unexpected events such as better or worse than normal weather—make the job of the forecaster that much more difficult. As this article is being written, the usual uncertainties are amplified by a new administration whose actions regarding the economy leave many questions as to the exact details and implementation.

For example, the new administration and Congress have promised to increase investment in infrastructure. However, it is not clear how much investment there will be and how Congress will fund that investment—it may be through increased taxes, increased borrowing, or some combination of both. Further, although investment in the country’s deteriorating infrastructure would have been a clear winner a few years ago when the construction industry was in deep recession and many construction workers were unemployed, with construction in an improved state and construction unemployment down, there is less room for such investment without putting undue pressure on the sector.

Another source of uncertainty is trade. Depending on how the administration’s avowed goal of renegotiating trade deals and raising tariff barriers is implemented, there is a distinct risk of sparking a trade war, which would adversely affect the economies of the United States and its trading partners. If carried to too great an extent, such a trade war could tip the country into recession.

Nonetheless, the near-term outlook for the economy and construction is bright. The national unemployment rate is near full employment. At the end of 2016, the unemployment rate was near a 9-year low. The not seasonally adjusted (NSA) construction unemployment rate in the summer of 2016 stood at its lowest rate since 2000 for comparable months.

The flip side of the low construction unemployment rate has been a rising shortage of skilled workers. Ironically, the shortage limits the ability for further employment in construction as projects are stretched out or otherwise delayed to accommodate the limited number of available skilled construction workers. Training programs are working to fill the need, but that is a long process, leaving a gap between supply and demand that is only slowly being filled. Depending on what infrastructure projects are approved at the federal level and the speed with which they are implemented, the shortage of skilled workers could be exacerbated, hurting overall construction.

With the economy performing better, the Federal Reserve (Fed) finally began to back off its extremely low interest rate regime. The Fed will raise its target federal funds rate by a quarter percent at least 3 times this year. Additional increases may well occur if fiscal stimulus threatens to overheat the economy. Given the administration’s spending plans, 5 increases in 2017 are very likely.

Non-residential building construction rebounded strongly in 2015—following on a healthy 2014—but slowed in 2016, although still turning in respectable growth that year. Current dollar construction spending rose 8% for the year after advancing 14% in 2015. Note that the spending numbers are in current dollars and are not adjusted for inflation. Most of that spending growth was concentrated on “For Lease” construction (Lodging, Office, and Retail)—up 18% compared to 14% in 2015. Meanwhile, institutional building construction rose by 5%, down from 6% in 2015, which followed falling construction spending in 2013 and 2014.

Heavy non-building (civil) engineering (or infrastructure) construction spending fell by about 1% in both 2015 and 2016. In 2015, that was driven by reduced spending on power construction projects (down 16%) following strong investment by that sector in 2014 (up 18%). In 2016, construction spending was down in all major categories, except power construction and highway construction, which were up a minimal 3% and 2%, respectively.

The forecast is for total construction spending to increase 6% this year—with non-residential building up 5%, heavy engineering up 4%, and residential up 8%. Among the major sectors in this forecast are the following:

•     Lodging. Companies have loosened their restrictions on travel following austerity measures during the recession and immediately thereafter. Leisure travel has increased as employment has improved and as households have felt more secure in their various job situations. The lodging sector vies for both business and leisure travelers. There has been considerable segmentation in the market as the industry tries to appeal to the various niches, from the budget minded to the luxury traveler. The result for the past few years has been significant investment in renovation and new building. That will largely level off this year with most of the increased spending due to increased construction costs.

•     Office. Although the square footage per employee has shrunk, the need for additional employees and reduced operating costs (coupled with pressure for “green” space) is pushing up spending on both new office construction and renovation/retrofitting older space. Spending on office construction has been surprisingly strong over the past 3 years—up 23% in 2014, up 18% in 2015, and up 25% in 2016. Expect healthy, but slower growth this year, in the low double digits—roughly half the 2016 rate. By 2018, that is likely to flatten out with increased spending matching rising labor and building materials costs.

•     Retail. The Internet has dramatically changed the landscape for brick and mortar stores in some categories (most notably for books and electronics), but the inroads for other sectors is limited or nonexistent. Grocery stores, restaurants, and various services (e.g., hair care) will not be supplanted by Internet alternatives, although these businesses may use the Internet as a means of marketing to and communicating with customers. Some retailers have successfully carved out niches in the market by also adopting the Internet as another sales tool and distribution channel while others struggle to adapt. Malls in particular are trying to meet the challenge as some of their large anchor stores have become vacant. The result is that mall management is renovating their vacant space and trying to make their properties more attractive to shoppers. Rising employment and expanding residential construction largely drive this category. Thus, some new malls are being built, but not at the pace of a few decades ago. Construction spending for retail increased 11% last year. This year and next, spending will at best match somewhat exceed rising construction costs this year and at best match them next year.

•     Health care. Uncertainty surrounding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) kept many health-care providers on the sideline over the past few years. That confusion continues as Congress and the administration move to repeal and replace the ACA. As of this writing nothing is clear on what the path forward will be and thus, health-care providers are reluctant to undertake major new projects. Most of the activity is for needed renovation and in a few cases, where the need is sufficient, for new facilities. Until it becomes clear what is going to happen with repeal and replace, health-care construction spending is unlikely to keep up with rising construction costs.

•     Education. For private education, the recovery from the recession and the rebound in the stock market meant resurgence in both contributions and the market value of portfolios over the past few years. Expansion plans previously put on hold were revived and new projects have been put forth. Meanwhile, public education in much of the nation suffered from reduced tax revenues as property values fell and school boards and legislatures faced opposition to any new tax or bond issuance. Rising house prices are now helping to improve property tax receipts. Also, parents are starting to push for new, updated facilities to address crowded and/or deteriorating classrooms. Given the time it takes for approval of new plans and new bond issues, this will be a drawn out process. Look for spending on education-related construction to rise somewhat faster than the rising cost of construction this year and next.

•     Multifamily Housing. The multifamily housing market was essentially fully recovered by the beginning of 2014. Since then, construction activity has largely leveled off. Any overbuilding in a particular market is quickly corrected as increased vacancy rates lead developers and their financial backers to stop new projects until the excess space is absorbed, usually within 6 to 18 months. With the ranks of young workers growing due to simple demographics and fear of homeownership still widespread among many, the outlook for multifamily housing remains bright with construction continuing around the pace set in recent years. The main change will be a slowdown in construction in the country’s largest cities and more activity in and around the next tier of “secondary” cities.

 

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the March/April 2017 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2017 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

Amazon: Friend or Foe?

That was the question of the day at the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW) 2017 Executive Summit in Washington, DC, where Rob Green, Director and General Manager of Amazon Business, tried to provide some answers in his presentation, “Amazon Business is Here, What Does That Mean for Distribution?,” to an attentive group of more than 350 distributors. But the audience conclusion was probably not what Amazon was hoping for.

Amazon is best viewed as a foe with benefits, according to Julia Klein, CEO of CH Briggs, a specialty hardware distributor that serves the East Coast. Her conclusion—at least the foe part—was shared by every distributor in the room. When NAW Chairman-Elect Joe Nettemeyer of Valin Corp. asked the audience if they considered Amazon to be a friend, not a single hand went up. He noted that there was apparently no need to ask the second part of his informal survey question.

The answer distributors are still waiting for is whether Amazon is a digital channel worth a shopping cart full of still-evolving and not-yet-defined potential threats to traditional channels of distribution. Until Amazon is able to communicate a clear win-win channel strategy to distributors, it will likely have a tough time gaining enthusiastic channel partners.

The presentation provided some history on how Amazon Business fits into Amazon’s overall business plans and Green’s take on the future of the unit. Right now, Amazon Business appears to be experiencing strong growth, according to Green, with sales increases of 20% month over month.

What it didn’t provide was the buy-in Amazon was looking for from those in the room as both a channel partner and supplier.

This issue of friend or foe represents an ongoing issue that has been part of Amazon’s bipolar courtship and competition with all sectors of distribution since it quietly launched AmazonSupply 5 years ago (something it had been building out for more than a decade). And the question was the first one raised in the Q&A session following Green’s presentation: If a distributor participates as a seller on Amazon Business, will Amazon mine its transaction and customer data to improve its ability to sell and compete against me with the same products?

Green’s answer first discussed a firewall between the 2 sides of Amazon—its marketplace where distributors have their own digital identity and manage pricing, versus being a direct vendor to Amazon for its sales and pricing management—where data is not shared between the 2 sides of the business. But he then seemed to qualify that answer with a clarification about how data mining is a key way in which Amazon optimizes its selling process. He concluded by suggesting an offline conversation for more detail.

As to whether distributors should consider Amazon a friend or foe, he stressed the opportunities to leverage Amazon’s reach in 2 different ways. As an Amazon Vendor, Amazon takes on the responsibility for pricing, shipping, and customer service for your products; as an Amazon Business Seller (or marketplace participant), you manage the pricing but have a choice in who handles the shipping and customer service. (See Figure 1.)

Based on comments by distributors throughout the rest of the NAW conference, the conclusion of many in the room was that Amazon has still not settled on an inclusive channel strategy. It’s a question many distributors and manufacturers have had for 10 years after Amazon bought a small appliance parts online seller as a platform, then created AmazonSupply and transitioned that into Amazon Business in 2015.

In the meantime, many distributors will reluctantly maintain an arms-length relationship and potential exposure of their customer analytics, but not raise a hand until it looks like Amazon clearly has the same intention.

Green provided additional insight on the internal power structure at Amazon, citing a comment by Jeff Bezos in his letter to shareholders in 2015: “AWS, Marketplace, and Prime are all examples of bold bets at Amazon that worked, and we’re fortunate to have those 3 big pillars.” Green’s goal is to make Amazon Business the fourth pillar that Bezos wants to build the company on. But he acknowledged that the 3 current pillars still drive the company and its resources.

This article originally appeared on mdm.com and is reprinted with permission from Modern Distribution Management/Gale Media, Inc. Material may not be reproduced in whole or in part without permission from MDM/Gale Media, Inc.

 

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the March/April 2017 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2017 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

1. Reflect on last year’s answer and describe, in retrospect, the outlook for 2017?

Steve Luse, NIA President and Union Contractor

It feels like 2017 will be a good year. The election of a new pro-business president has seemed to jump-start the economy and we are seeing signs that many projects that have been put on hold are resurfacing again. If the oil and gas industry comes back strong, it will be great for the insulation industry as a whole. Also, if regulations on the power industry are relaxed, that could be big for our industry as well.

Darrel Bailey, NIA President-Elect and Union Contractor

In 2016, the industry experienced some large swings in geographic regions with some markets up and some significantly down, but overall the market experienced a small increase over 2015. In 2017, I believe we will see an uptick in the industrial and power markets with a large increase in new gas-fired power plants replacing the coal-fired plant closures in 2015 and 2016. We may also see a 30% increase in the oil and gas sector if the price of oil continues to inch up. Commercial insulation work is at a peak in most of the major cities in the United States.

Dana Vlk, NIA Assistant Treasurer and Distributor

I would expect moderate growth in both the commercial and industrial markets in 2017. As a result of low oil prices and a decline in drilling in 2016, many projects last year were delayed; we expect some of those projects to proceed in 2017.

Jeff DeGraaf, NIA MICA Representative and Merit Contractor

I believe that 2016 happened just about as we expected. There is consistent work throughout the country. We had budgeted for a slight decrease in our work load for 2017. Current conditions through the first half of February have shown us an increase in bid requests, so we may have to adjust our work load up a bit.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

When I look at last year’s remarks they look like something I would write for 2017 as well.  The story is pretty similar, just the dates have changed to reflect slower than expected start dates.

In 2016 I said, “The outlook for 2016 is mixed as well. Oil will remain a big factor in some areas of the country for 2016. On the downstream side, however, end users are planning massive investments in gas-fed power plants, particularly gas originating from the Marcellus Shale fields in West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. I think other opportunities will also arise from manufacturing taking advantage of cheap natural gas. Should this take off as expected, I would expect tight supplies of mineral wool again in 2016. I do have some concern that energy-saving initiatives might slow a bit as energy prices go down and paybacks increase. Cheap oil and gas has resulted in cheaper electricity and overall utility bills for large end users.”

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

I think in many respects 2016 was very similar to 2015. There was a marginal level of growth but not enough to realize any relief from the highly competitive nature of the business. Market size and share concerns, coupled with backlog considerations, continue to influence and emphasize the deployment of short-term sales tactics versus longer-term strategic concepts. With the continued weakness in crude oil prices, there appears to be a more lax approach to enforcing the new energy code requirements for envelope and process flow assemblies. It is also fair to suggest the presidential election campaign impacted the performance of many market segments as no one knew for sure which outcome would prevail. Now that it is over, there are still many questions and concerns as the political status quo has been shaken to its core. We have yet to realize the impact, even though initial responses from the market suggest optimism with the potential reductions in regulations being one of the main priorities of the new administration.

David Dzina, NIA Past President and Metal Building Laminator

The outlook for 2017 will be as good or slightly better than last year. I believe that we all can make or break our year by adapting to our markets knowing that despite the current economic conditions, we will find innovative ways to assist our customers in growing their bottom lines.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

I think the outlook for 2017 is very positive. We have observed a lot of companies and manufacturers starting to invest resources back into expansion projects. We are also seeing an influx of new school and school remodel work scheduled for 2017.

2. What do you see as the top 3 challenges for 2017?

Steve Luse, NIA President and Union Contractor

For union markets, the introduction of non-union competitors is the biggest challenge. The International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers and contractors must look at these challenges and think outside the box. We must take some type of bold action or union contracting will fade away in those markets like they have in others throughout the country. Union or non-union, a skilled workforce is a challenge. We need to figure out a way to draw younger folks into our industry. For our fourth-generation company, the next challenge is how to transition to the next generation and what will draw them into this business.

Darrel Bailey, NIA President-Elect and Union Contractor

Major challenges will continue to be the training of replacements for our retiring work force: Supervisors, Estimators, and Project Managers. We are all also experiencing a shortage of craft workers and our challenge will be how to get the youth of today interested in our great industry!

One of the key challenges for the future for all of us will be the development and implementation of leadership training and development programs within our companies and the industry.

Dana Vlk, NIA Assistant Treasurer and Distributor

Due to the recession in the middle of this decade, a high number of construction jobs were eliminated and many of these people did not re-enter the construction workforce. Additionally, we are experiencing a steady exodus of Baby Boomers from the workforce. Both of these factors lead to a reduced workforce as well as a decline in technical expertise. This situation dovetails into generational differences in the workforce and how to hire, train, and retain the younger generation.

Jeff DeGraaf, NIA MICA Representative and Merit Contractor

One of the challenges is trying to determine how the current legislature will move forward, if at all. The constant fighting among the parties cannot be good for our country. The question is, how will it affect the overall view of companies wanting to build in the United States?

Another challenge will be how the market responds to higher interest rates. In November, after President Trump was elected, the market did not fall (for the first time in years) after there was a rise in the prime interest rate. That is a comforting occurrence, and hopefully the trend will continue.

The third and probably biggest of the 3 is field labor, both quality and availability. There is a general consensus that skilled workers are retiring and the newer workers have not learned the same skill and drive of the more experienced workers. The problem is far bigger than any one company, so it will be the responsibility of the owners and contractors to come up with a solution to this problem.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

For 2017 the biggest issue I see is skilled labor. Demand is so strong for skilled labor that there are already shortages in certain areas of the country. I see no let up for the foreseeable future. There is also increased demand for professional staff and demand for quality Estimators and Project Managers remains strong. Of course, the election has taken center stage, and I don’t think anyone can predict where our government is headed and what the effect on our industry might be.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

Will the new administration create real growth in the economy and will it be possible for both sides of the aisle to rally around the topics that clearly represent an improvement in the living conditions for the middle class? Job creation from both the public and private sector is a critical component to the realization of sustained and substantial growth of our GDP. Our various media outlets and the White House must come to an understanding and hopefully realize that the public currently recognizes and disapproves of their adversarial relationship. Each side is wielding power without thoughtful consideration of the mid- to long-term effects of this chronic consternation. The left and right must find substantive common ground to pass effective and meaningful legislation.

There is still a significant need and opportunity to work with members of the specifying and design community to assist them in the adaptation of the new performance standards that exist within the new energy and building codes. This learning curve must be conquered if we are to realize the benefits of what should be considered the new normal.

If there is a significant increase in the demand for in-place construction, there will be an acute shortage of skilled labor to do the work, regardless of whether it is for infrastructure or building construction. This shortage will create inflationary pressure on wages and potentially limit the capacity of the industry to realize significant growth in the short and mid-term.

David Dzina, NIA Past President and Metal Building Laminator

The top challenges are finding the right people, controlling costs, and committing to effective leadership that will drive positive change.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

First would be obtaining enough qualified labor, second would be to hold back from getting more work than you can accomplish with the limited labor out there, and third is staying current with inflation as it starts to ramp up again.

3. What most excites you in the coming year?

Steve Luse, NIA President and Union Contractor

It has been incredibly rewarding to be the President of NIA over the past year. This year, I look forward to advising my friend, Darrel Bailey, as he steps up to take the position of NIA’s President.

Darrel Bailey, NIA President-Elect and Union Contractor

I am excited to become NIA’s President! What a great honor it will to be to lead the fantastic group of individuals that make up NIA. I am excited for the opportunity to give something back to this great industry that has made so many things possible for me and my family over the last 40 years!

Dana Vlk, NIA Assistant Treasurer and Distributor

During an election year, it seems that there is little movement in business while waiting for the outcome; 2017 presents an opportunity to move forward as a country and an industry.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

The changes in DC—I don’t know if it’s going to be good or bad but it certainly is exciting.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

I hope that politics as usual is nothing of the sort. It is time to shake the tree and rattle the cage of the political elite and various media outlets in order to effectively do the business of the people. We need to build a newer and more robust economy that expands opportunity—in particular within the inner core of our largest cities. This could include the redevelopment of many residential, commercial, and industrial buildings.

David Dzina, NIA Past President and Metal Building Laminator

The opportunity to be creative in an ever changing, fast-paced, and extremely competitive environment. The competitive market that exists today will force us to find ways to excel and bring value to our customer base.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

Training new employees with the new updated NCCER curriculum and the new National Commercial & Industrial Insulation Standards manual, also known as the Midwest Insulation Contractors Association (MICA) manual.

4. What types of design issues do you see that are caused by out-of-date specifications? What do you recommend when a job has outdated specifications?

Ron King, NIA Past President Advisor

This is an age old problem. The problem I believe is centered on education of the specifiers. Education related to all aspects of mechanical insulation systems (materials, installation, maintenance, etc.) is basically nonexistent. Combined with the loss of an experienced knowledge base due to right-sizing, multitasking, attrition, and a host of other events, the need has never been greater to ensure that mechanical insulation systems are being utilized to achieve their full potential in heating and venting air conditioning systems, hot and cold water plumbing systems, energy efficiency, emission reduction, personnel protection, and other design objectives.

This starts with the specifiers. In many cases, old specifications are simply cut and pasted into a new set of specifications. Many products have changed, new and better products may be available, installation methods may have been modified, etc. The specifiers must commit to implementing a continual mechanical insulation educational program. NIA is certainly the avenue to assist in that endeavor.

During the bidding process, the mechanical insulation contractor is normally the first to recognize an old or outdated specification, which can put them in a difficult position. Do they tell those involved the specification is outdated, submit an alternate, wait until they secure the business, or just proceed to comply with the specification? The answer lies with education at the specifier level. The bigger question is how that can be accomplished in an unbiased way.

Jeff DeGraaf, NIA MICA Representative and Merit Contractor

We continually see outdated design specs. The way we usually handle these is to contact our customer, point out the issues, and try to guide them to better specs in the industry. If they are not interested and we continue in the bid process, our clarifications and exceptions just keep getting longer. We very seldom bid on a system we do not believe will work.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

There is a constant problem that has been an issue for as long as I’ve been in the business: specifications just don’t keep up with new technology, means, or methods. Outdated or misapplied specifications lead to all sorts of design issues, not to mention unnecessary warranty work. The question is, what do you recommend when a job has outdated specifications? We try and work with the engineering community, mechanical contractors, and owners to educate them on the shortcomings of their specifications—sometimes this is successful, and sometimes it is not. The easiest thing to do is to refer them to the manufacturer’s literature—since they make the products and create the warranties, contractors should be installing their products per their recommendations.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

The most obvious issue is the continued use of less effective methods and materials to reduce energy consumption within the building construction process, which ultimately affects life-cycle cost and building performance. Design issues are a result of code compliance and it is obvious we need improvement to the process of enacting these significant energy code changes. The government needs to improve their capability or the use of private/public services should be considered to expedite the conversion and compliance process.

David Dzina, NIA Past President and Metal Building Laminator

At times we can all be prisoners of our past. We need concentrated efforts to educate and change out-of-date, inefficient specifications. When we find jobs with these out-of-date specifications, the first priority is to realize the importance of bringing the specification up to date. If we do not do this, we will continue to suffer, as we are enabling the system and not being agents of change.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

Usually, our problem is space. Using out-of-date specifications can cause there to be insufficient space for insulation, causing issues.

Contact the engineer and try to set up a meeting where you can educate their company on the new materials and procedures used in the insulation industry. Using the new MICA manual presentation will give contractors a great tool to take to the engineering community and get them up to speed.

5. Since there is no training on mechanical insulation in engineering schools, what expertise would you like to share with engineers?

Dana Vlk, NIA Assistant Treasurer and Distributor

NIA is a great resource for engineers. In addition to a large member body of industry experts, NIA offers tools and training that would benefit the engineering community.

Jeff DeGraaf, NIA MICA Representative and Merit Contractor

I am on the National Commercial & Industrial Insulation Standards manual technical committee (MICA manual). We are in the process of creating a presentation to be shown to engineers throughout the country. Hopefully this will help them get more informed.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

I would like to share my 35 years of headaches caused by dealing with these issues. I would like to share the need for  training. If they don’t get the knowledge while in school, they really need to attend continuing education classes geared toward insulation. One problem has been the lack of available quality training and a willingness to attend what is available.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

Using the Mechanical Insulation Design Guide (MIDG) would be a good starting place. This living document addresses the common conditions and details that are associated with mechanical construction practices. It includes proper product or material selection and resources to ensure they are installed correctly. In the future it could include every code requirement and there could be a short list of proven solutions that would include the derivation process as it relates to identifying the right compliance path.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

The MICA standards manual. The MICA standards manual is the best thing in the insulation industry for engineers. MICA is unveiling a presentation that members can use to help educate the engineering community.

6. What is your advice to maintenance engineers to keep insulation performing at an optimal level? Is there anything you would like to make engineers aware of?

Dana Vlk, NIA Assistant Treasurer and Distributor

Insulation should be considered an integral design component for efficiency, energy and cost savings, and prolonging longevity of equipment. Operating under a proper maintenance plan and considering insulation at the beginning of a project should be a priority.

Ron King, NIA Past President Advisor

Implement a meaningful inspection program. Insulation systems, like all mechanical systems, require periodic inspection and maintenance. While inspection and maintenance are the responsibility of the owner, the fact is that most insulation systems are frequently ignored. With time, insulation systems can be damaged by a variety of circumstances; if they are not repaired or replaced, they can become ineffective. Insulation contractors can play a key role in facilitating regular inspection and maintenance programs.

Failure to perform inspection and timely maintenance carries a number of risks. At a minimum, insulated areas should be inspected annually. Inspection of the external surface should include signs of cracking, distortion, damage, corrosion, evidence of hot spots on high-temperature systems, or condensation or ice build-up on low-temperature systems.

There are risks associated with not maintaining a mechanical insulation system in a timely and effective manner. Those risks, and the severity of those risks, will vary depending upon the use/service temperature of the operating system on which the insulation is installed, the surrounding environment, ambient conditions, the extent of any damage to the insulation system, the insulation system design, quality of the installation, the time line of correcting any damage, and other occurrences that may be unique to the area in question.
Mechanical insulation should not be installed and forgotten. Inspect and correct any damage in a timely and proper manner.

Jeff DeGraaf, NIA MICA Representative and Merit Contractor

Maintaining a proper insulation system is an extremely fast return on investment, just from the energy saved. When you consider the costs of a plant going down due to frozen or otherwise damaged pipes, there really is only an upside to maintaining insulation.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

Maintenance, maintenance, maintenance. Is there anything I would like to make engineers aware of? The energy loss and the cost of not maintaining their insulation. Energy appraisals are a huge eye opener when done correctly and presented properly.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

From a building envelope perspective, it is important to ensure the vapor barrier is not compromised and the envelope is free of condensation or moisture. If moisture is present, employ a method to dry it out and eliminate the cause of moisture.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

Survey your insulation systems on a biannual basis. You need to check your insulation systems regularly and repair them when needed to obtain a long insulation life for your facility.

When you see water stains on insulation, take care of it immediately. Do not wait until the end of the cooling season. By then, your insulation system might not be salvageable.

7. What insulation project would you recommend to facility/plant owners and managers if they are willing to start with one?

(Editor’s Note: Our experts agree! NIA’s Insulation Energy Appraisers are the best way to start any project.)

Dana Vlk, NIA Assistant Treasurer and Distributor

Invite a NIA Certified Insulation Energy Appraiser to conduct a study in their facility (there is a list of Certified Appraisers available at https://tinyurl.com/nzcozfb). The information gathered will alert owners and managers to measures they can take with mechanical insulation to enhance thermal performance and will also highlight the payback on the investment. I think many people would be surprised by the return on investment (ROI) from mechanical insulation.

Ron King, NIA Past President Advisor

Implement a meaningful annual inspection program and maintenance program. The short and especially the long-term savings will exceed the annual expense. It will save energy, reduce emissions, help ensure personnel protection, improve processes, and help guard against the requirement for future capital expenses and expensive downtime. It is not complicated if you examine the advantages over time rather than considering mechanical insulation maintenance to be an annual expense—it is an investment with an attractive ROI.

Jeff DeGraaf, NIA MICA Representative and Merit Contractor

A simple first step is to replace damaged insulation on your steam system and insulate all valves and flanges. The ROI on this is a few months.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

Start with an insulation energy appraisal. The appraisal will show you where you will get the biggest bang for your buck. There isn’t a better way to prioritize.

Mike McLain, At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

From my perspective it would be to conduct a complete energy analysis with respect to heating, cooling, and ventilation. This would consist of performing an infrared (IR) scan of the roof and wall envelopes to detect thermal bridging (IR thermography), and test for random air infiltration. The qualitative results of these tests can provide the responsible party with a series of options to upgrade the structure so that it performs at an optimal level with respect to energy efficiency and code compliance. The resulting work could be a simple repair or replacement of components of the structure or a complete redesign and installation of the envelope’s insulation (including penetrations) and replacing or upgrading the entire HVAC system.

David Dzina, NIA Past President and Metal Building Laminator

My recommendation would be to have a Certified Insulation Energy Appraiser come out to your facility and perform an energy audit. From there I would recommend starting with the smallest project and moving to the largest project. You will experience wins along the way in accomplishing energy efficiency at your facility or plant. The reason I would start on the small projects first is that they often end up causing the most trouble since they go unnoticed.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

Repair  the damaged insulation systems in your plant—these are the most important projects. Most people put these repairs off for too long and then the insulation system has been destroyed.

8. What are a few of the strategic initiatives that mechanical insulation industry participants should be focused on to grow and improve their businesses as the industry evolves?

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

Participate in the committee work within ASHRAE, ASTM, and the various code bodies to help craft the solutions that will meet future demands. Work with the specifying community and trades to ensure compliance with the new standards. Be involved on the front end of the process while driving the changes into the market. Be a leader!

David Dzina, NIA Past President and Metal Building Laminator

The first is we must have a training and certification program for the industry. It will bring more credibility and prevent poor installation from causing products to perform less efficiently.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

We need to get engineers educated on insulation because their schooling isn’t doing it. We also need to get the MICA manual in the hands of these engineers and get them to use it in their projects.

9. There is sometimes a disconnect between what insulation installers know to be best practices and what actually occurs on the job site—what advice would you give to engineers and PMs to ensure insulation is installed properly on site?

Ron King, NIA Past President Advisor

Very simple—inspect what you expect. Implement a continual and meaningful inspection program and follow through on all problems that are identified to ensure they are corrected properly and in a timely manner.

Jeff DeGraaf, NIA MICA Representative and Merit Contractor

I would suggest you have your contractor submit insulation details/plates, showing you exactly how he or she plans to address each aspect of the insulation system. Then do daily or weekly inspections to make sure it is being done according to plan.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

Start by collecting references. Look at the experience of the company you have chosen. Do they have experience in that particular discipline? Demand that your contractor of choice has and abides by a comprehensive Quality Assurance Program (QAP). Unfortunately, there are a lot of companies that don’t even have a basic QAP.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

Get out on site and practice what you preach. One is not required to be involved with a government job in order to inspect the work as it is performed. On-the-job training is always effective so long as it is presented properly. We are all creatures of habit, which does not mean we are to be enslaved by them. Effective leadership is absolutely essential and must be backed up by the appropriate action. Answering the “W” questions (who, what, when, where, and most importantly, why) will go a long way in getting someone to consider and apply a different method. My mantra is to inform, involve, and inspire.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

First and foremost is to use the MICA manual plates in the submittal process. This puts the engineer and the mechanical insulation contractor on the same page before the first piece of insulation is installed.

10. What is the most important maintenance activity for those who are managing or supervising a building with insulated systems?

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

Replace what you pull off. It is amazing to see how much insulation is removed during maintenance and never replaced.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

To learn and know how the system is to perform at its optimal level and ensure that conditions within the structure and the system are such to allow it to happen. Repair and replace anything that is out of balance with that initiative.

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

How to identify damaged insulation in your facility and what it can do if it is not addressed in a timely fashion.

11. What impact do you think the new administration will have on the construction industry?

Darrel Bailey, NIA President-Elect and Union Contractor

If it is successful in its agenda of bringing back industry and jobs to America, rebuilding our infrastructure, and relieving the burden of excessive regulations on businesses, then it could be huge for the industry.

Dana Vlk, NIA Assistant Treasurer and Distributor

I think it will have a positive impact. The markets seem to be reacting well and new projects are being approved. Infrastructure spending will likely foster growth in our industry.

Ron King, NIA Past President Advisor

With a new President and federal administration change, it typically takes 6–12 months to understand the direction the new administration will be taking and the potential impact it may have on specific industry segments. Policies, practices, and programs that were implemented under the previous administration cannot easily be stopped in mid-stream. They must be wound down or modified to reflect the direction of the new administration.

Depending on how you view the campaign promises or latest comments from the President or his cabinet, you could easily argue the new administration’s goals could have a positive impact on the mechanical insulation industry.

If manufacturing in the United States is expanding, or they are modernizing their facilities, that could certainly create opportunities. If decreased regulations motivate businesses to invest in their business, that should also create opportunities. If corporate tax rates are reduced, past history indicates that should create opportunities. There are many similar examples, but we cannot forget there are many other factors that can influence the impact of these changes: interest rates, oil prices, terrorism, foreign conflicts, and consumer confidence, just to name a few.

I think this question will be much more relevant in late 2017/early 2018. While there are many signs that the new administration should have a positive impact on our industry over time, there are just too many variables or unknowns at this time—combined with potential economy and global relationship questions—that I would hesitate to make any bolder predications at this point.

David Dzina, NIA Past President and Metal Building Laminator

During the campaign this administration promised it will be a friend to business. If that proves to be the case, and I do not see any reason why it should not, our industry will experience a tremendous amount of growth in the coming years. My hope is that any administration is pro-market and understands the role of the government in the marketplace—to promote an environment for businesses to have equal opportunity to compete, create level tax rates for all businesses, eliminate tax incentives for specific industries, and allow competition to expand, which always benefits the consumer by providing higher quality goods and competitive prices. If this administration and any that follow it will step up and do that, our economy and industry will thrive.

John Lamberton, NIA At-Large Representative and Union Contractor

My crystal ball is in the shop for repairs. It’s been giving me bad predictions and needs to be recalibrated.

Mike McLain, NIA At-Large Representative and Metal Building Laminator

If the partisan gridlock loosens its grip on hate, fear, and regret, the agenda of the new administration will have an opportunity to make a difference. When this occurs, one will assume unnecessary regulations will have been lifted, meaningful tax reform will be in place, and health insurance will be addressed in a manner that provides reasonable and affordable care for all, delivered from the private sector. When this occurs, we may see growth the likes of which most in our nation will have never experienced in their entire lifetime. Perhaps we could we see a return to the ’50s and ’60s?

Pete Gauchel, NIA Past President and Merit Contractor

I believe the Trump administration will have a positive effect on our industry. I see construction throughout our country increasing and because of the increase in activity, I also see wages going up due to the lack of skilled labor.

 

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the March/April 2017 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2017 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

IO1704_01

The National Insulation Association (NIA) publishes a glossary of insulation science terminology, which is updated quarterly by NIA’s Technical Information Committee. Below is a list of new and commonly used terms. Visit insulation.org/about-insulation/system-design/techs-specs to download the full glossary or see NIA’s other technical resources.

Thermal Properties of Insulation
Usually expressed as C-value, K-value, R-value, and U-value.

Conductance, Thermal, C-value
The time rate of steady state heat flow through a unit area of a material or construction induced by a unit temperature difference between the body surfaces.

Conductivity, Thermal (K-value)
The measure of heat that passes through a unit area of a homogeneous substance, through a unit thickness, in a unit of time, for each unit temperature difference.
The lower the K-value, the higher the insulating value. Note: I-P units are Btu – in / hr – ft2 – °F and typical SI units are Watts / m – °C.
Definition Two: The time rate of steady heat flow through a unit area of a homogeneous material induced by a unit temperature gradient in a direction perpendicular to that unit area.

Resistance, Thermal, (R-value)
A measure of the ability to retard heat flow rather than the ability to transmit heat. R-value is the numerical reciprocal of “U” or “C,” thus R = 1/U or 1/C.
Thermal resistance R-value is used in combination with numerals to designate thermal resistance values: R-11 equals 11 resistance units. The higher the “R,” the higher the insulating value. The I-P units are °F – ft2 – hr / Btu; the SI units are °C – m2 / W.

Resistivity, Thermal, r
The quantity determined by the temperature difference, at steady state, between 2 defined parallel surfaces of a homogeneous material of unit thickness, that induces a unit heat flow rate through a unit area. (r in SI units: m K/W.) (r in inch-pound units: h ft F/Btu or, h ft ² F/Btu in.)

Transmittance, Thermal (U-value)
The combined thermal value of all the materials in an insulation system, air spaces, and surface air films. The heat transmission in unit time through the unit area of a material or construction and boundary air films, induced by unit temperature difference between the environments on each side. The I-P units are Btu / (hr – sq ft – deg F temperature difference) and the SI units are W / (sq m – deg C temperature difference). Note: This heat transmission rate has been called the overall coefficient of heat transfer.

Thermal Capacity
The quantity of heat required to change the temperature of the body one degree. For a homogeneous body, it is the product of mass and specific heat. For a non-homogeneous body, it is the sum of the products of mass and specific heat of the individual constituents. (May also be seen as heat capacity.)

Thermal Insulation
Definition 1: Insulation applicable within the general temperature range of –300°F to 1800°F.
Definition 2: A material or assembly of materials used to provide resistance to heat flow.

Thermal Insulation System
Applied or installed thermal insulation complete with any accessories, vapor retarder, and facing required.

Transference, Thermal
The steady-state heat flow from (or to) a body through applied thermal insulation and to (or from) the external surroundings by conduction, convection, and radiation. It is expressed as the time rate of heat flow per unit area of the body surface per unit temperature difference between the body surface and the external surroundings.

Transmission, Heat
The quantity of heat flowing through unit area due to all modes of heat transfer induced by the prevailing conditions.

Cladding (as Related to Insulation Jacketing)—Synonymous with Jacketing
Discussion—The three terms “jacketing,” “lagging,” and “cladding” are considered synonymous in most metal jacket related applications and geographies. However, in some cases in the power industry in North America the term “lagging” has a different meaning than “jacketing” or “cladding” and refers specifically to a heavier gauge of jacketing.

Jacket (as Related to Insulation Jacketing)
A protective covering installed over thermal insulation.

Facing
A thin covering adhered to the surface of insulation prior to field installation.

Finish (as Related to Insulation Metal Jacketing)
The texture of the metal surface.

Finishes
Jackets, mastics, or strong films used for aesthetics or to protect insulation from at least one or more of the following: weather, mechanical, and/or
personnel abuse.

Lag
(v.) To apply lagging. (n.) A single piece of covering material.

Lagging (as Related to Insulation Jacketing) Synonymous with Jacketing
Discussion—The 3 terms “jacketing,” “lagging,” and “cladding” are considered synonymous in most metal jacket related applications and geographies. However, in some cases in the power industry in North America the term “lagging” has a different meaning than “jacketing” or “cladding” and refers specifically to a heavier gauge of jacketing.

Lagging Adhesive
Water-based resin emulsion products that are used to adhere lagging cloth to the insulation and to itself at the lap joints. They also seal and size the fabric and shrink it tightly to the surface. They can be brushed or sprayed.

Lagging—Insulation
Definition 1: A block material for insulating tanks and boilers, usually curved or tapered, and can be made from any of several insulation materials.
Definition 2: Insulation used on pipe, tanks, ducts, vessels, or other mechanical equipment. Discussion—Lagging insulation is usually applied in the form of cut, pieced together, or mitered parts.

Lagging—Jacketing
Jacketing installed over insulation.  Also see “Jacket.”

Laminate
A product made by bonding together 2 or more layers of material or materials.

Laminate Jacket
A thin, flexible sheet material intended for use as a jacket over thermal insulation on pipe, duct, or equipment, and consisting of multiple layers of polymer film and aluminum foil bonded together.
Discussion—A laminate jacket is available with or without a factory applied pressure sensitive adhesive.
Discussion—Laminate jacket is commercially available in different widths, it typically is provided in approximate widths of pipe insulation sections.

Laminate Tape
A thin, flexible sheet material intended for use as a tape to seal and secure a laminate jacket over thermal insulation on pipe, duct, or equipment.
Discussion—Laminate tape always has a factory applied, pressure sensitive adhesive which first requires removal of a release liner.
Discussion—Laminate tape is commercially available in several different widths.
Discussion—A laminate tape can also include a polymer coating as a top surface.

Lap Adhesive
The adhesive used to seal the butt joints and laps of insulation jackets.

ASJ: All Service Jacket; (Traditional Paper Type)
A white, flexible reinforced lamination with Paper as exposed layer which is used as a vapor retarder and finish for pipe, tank, and equipment insulation.

ASJ: All Service Jacket; (Polymeric Film Type)
A white, flexible reinforced lamination with Polymeric film as exposed layer which is used as a vapor retarder and finish for pipe, tank, and equipment insulation.

Flexible Cellular Material
N—A cellular material that will not rupture within a specified time when bent around a mandrel at a specified uniform temperature and rate.
Discussion—Test Methods D3574 “Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams” provides a standard procedure for assessing whether an insulation material is a flexible cellular material.

Slag Wool
A mineral wool made usually from molten blast-furnace slag by the action of jets of steam under high pressure.

Emissivity
Emissivity is for pure materials that are perfectly smooth. The ratio of the radiant flux given off (emitted) by a surface to that given off (emitted) by a blackbody at the same temperature and under the same conditions.

Emittance
Emittance is for rough and contaminated surfaces (practical surfaces). The ratio of the radiant flux given off (emitted) by a surface to that given off (emitted) by a blackbody at the same temperature and under the same conditions.

Emittance, Directional
The ratio of the radiance from a surface in a particular direction to the radiance from a blackbody at the same temperature under the same conditions.

Emittance, Hemispherical
The average directional emittance over a hemispherical envelope covering a surface.

Emittance, Spectral
An emittance based on the radiant energy emitted per unit wavelength interval (monochromatic radiant energy).

Emittance, Total
An emittance that is an integrated average over all wavelengths of radiant energy emitted.

Absorptance
The ratio of the radiant flux absorbed by a body to that incident upon it.

Absorption
Transformation of radiant energy to a different form of energy by interaction with matter.

Adsorption
Adsorption is the physical adherence or bonding of ions and molecules onto the surface of another molecule.

Sorption
Sorption refers to the process in which one substance takes up or holds another (by either absorption or adsorption).

 

If you have questions or suggestions, please contact us at publisher@insulation.org.

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the January 2017 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2017 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized  duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

 

 

IO170103_01

While people may generally know insulation is beneficial, few people receive an education on how many benefits it has, and more importantly, how to properly design an insulation system based on the unique conditions around that system. The National Insulation Association’s (NIA’s) research has found that most engineers and specifiers receive no training on this prior to starting field work. While there is value in learning as you go, you may not get the chance to understand the full picture. To this end, NIA has developed—sometimes with the help of other construction industry partners—a number of educational tools. Another part of NIA’s mission is to demonstrate that insulation’s benefits are incredible and also, easily quantifiable. The following tools can help users learn how to properly design, specify, install, and maintain insulation, leading to a host of benefits for their facilities.

Basic Learning and Awareness Tools

The Mechanical Insulation Education and Awareness E-Learning Series

If you’re looking for a basic level of insulation training, the Mechanical Insulation Education and Awareness E-Learning Series is a good place to start. The E-Learning Series contains 5 different modules ranging from 15 to 35 minutes in length. They can be a helpful learning tool for those responsible for system design, energy efficiency, overseeing
maintenance, specifying materials, keeping your facility running smoothly, or for those who are new to the field. Available at www.insulation.org/training-tools/e-learning-modules, these modules provide data on the science behind insulation, help specifiers and system designers construct insulation systems, explain design considerations, and reveal practical data and case studies outlining potential energy savings. Those who complete the e-learning course are also eligible for educational credit from the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) and its sister organization, the Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI), as well as the American Institute of Architects (AIA); NIA also offers professional development hours (PDHs) for its completion.

The Fundamentals of Insulation Workbook and DVD

The Fundamentals of Insulation program was developed by NIA’s joint Associates/Distribution Committee and is designed to teach new employees how to optimize their customer service skills. The DVD is spilt into 9 modules of approximately 3–4 minutes each and cover Heat Flow Basics; Btus; Ks, Rs, and Cs; Insulation Selection Criteria; Cold and Colder Environments; Normal to Hot Environments; Super Hot Environments; Protective Coverings and Finishes; Specifications and Codes; and Selling Tools. These learning tools will help employees learn information they can apply in insulation sales situation, making for a better bottom line.

NIA’s Insulation Sampler

NIA’s Insulation Sampler provides samples of 20 generic mechanical insulation product types and accessories. These small, portable sample boxes are designed for ease of use, with an illustrative product schematic guide that denotes the product type. Each sample has its own compartment space to remain organized and undamaged within the sample box. In developing this kit, NIA aimed to represent many major mechanical insulation types. The kit is an excellent tool for your internal training and resource library, as well as external sales discussions and presentations.

Mechanical Insulation Industry Marketing Flyers

Working in collaboration with our strategic partners through the Department of Energy (DOE) Mechanical Insulation Education and Awareness (MIC) program, NIA created 3 different industry marketing flyers that promote, respectively, commercial and industrial insulation savings; the MIDG Simple Calculators; and the Mechanical Insulation Education & Awareness E-Learning Series.

The Power of Insulation: A Proven Energy-Saving Solution

This brochure answers the question, “Why insulate?” It is an ideal tool for discussions about insulation maintenance or why you should undertake new insulation projects. It points to the many benefits of insulation, including energy conservation, enhanced employee safety, reduced energy costs and green-house gas (GHG) emissions, and more. The colorful and informative 6-page brochure also provides a list of helpful resources and insulation tools.

Advanced Tools and Resources

The Mechanical Insulation Design Guide (MIDG)

The MIDG is one of the most comprehensive mechanical insulation resources on the web. It answers the insulation designer’s basic questions—what, when, why, where, and how—and is useful for both beginners and experienced professionals in the construction, design, specification, maintenance, and management fields. This advanced, detailed tool walks you through the steps to build an insulation system correctly. Find everything you need to know about the design, selection, specification, installation, and maintenance of mechanical insulation. The MIDG also links to NIA’s MTL Product Catalog, www.insulation.org/mtl, the only online library of technical product literature and videos for the insulation industry, searchable by product or company. If you are looking for detailed product information that can help with product specifications, these tools can be extremely helpful. The MIDG is available at http://tinyurl.com/gma4ads.

Insulation Simple Calculators

These unique calculators are designed to make common mechanical insulation calculations easy for users of all levels. These tools make it easy to discover proper insulation thickness, financial and energy savings, and the ideal insulation design. Visit http://tinyurl.com/micalculators to see the different calculators available.

NIA’s Online Training Portal at Vimeo

NIA recently launched an online video streaming portal to expand its training and educational offerings and distribution. NIA’s Vimeo page contains archived versions of NIA business webinars on leadership and personnel, long-term business planning, health and safety heat-illness prevention on the jobsite, and injury reporting and recordkeeping. It also contains videos about the MIDG that can help users with their insulation installation questions. Additionally, there are videos of the manufacturer panels from NIA’s 61st Annual Convention, where 2 panels of manufacturing executives discussed issues currently facing the industry.

On this site, users can also access NIA’s Mechanical Insulation Installation Video Series, which provide a general product overview, safety information, and a how-to guide for installing mechanical insulation for various applications. Each video incorporates consensus recommendations from the sponsoring manufacturers, and the applications demonstrated were completed by experienced field mechanics on piping and equipment mock-ups representing project applications. The videos are a great industry resource for supplementing existing craft training programs, as educational programs for new or existing sales or insulation service employees, and for indirect users to obtain an overview of application practices for the respective insulation materials.

Visit NIA’s page at https://vimeo.com/niainfo/vod_pages to see all of NIA’s available resources.

Insulation Outlook Archive

Insulation Outlook magazine maintains an online archive for ongoing educational purposes, including past columns detailing the physical properties of insulation materials or mechanical system design. These columns, available at www.insulation.org/io/ columns, contain information on insulation materials and finishes, and can be a tremendous resource for those looking for in-depth information on materials that can help with project specifications. The archive also has a series on understanding thermal systems that go into detail about how these systems work and how they should be designed.

The National Insulation Association: Your One-Stop Shop for Insulation Knowledge

NIA is committed to helping insulation users expand their knowledge and learn more about the benefits insulation can offer to their systems. Insulation is a proven means for saving energy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing process productivity, providing a safer and more productive work environment, controlling condensation (which can lead to mold growth) supporting sustainable design technology, and host of other benefits. The resources above can expand your understanding of all the benefits insulation offers, and then lead you through the design process to ensure insulation is properly installed and maintained in your systems, leading to tremendous financial and energy savings, increased safety, and lower environment impact. Our website also offers updates on other NIA programs, activities, and insulation-related legislation. Visit www.Insulation.org to learn more.

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the January 2017 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2017 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized  duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

 

IO170101_01

Mechanical engineers and insulation contractors are critical components to every successful build, particularly when it comes to designing and installing insulation systems. Engineers design the insulation systems that help ensure that mechanical systems within buildings operate efficiently, while contractors bring those designs to life by installing the insulation to the engineer’s specifications. While these 2 roles directly relate to each other, they typically operate independently of one another. Even though this is the standard process for insulation system design and installation, it can prove to cause some disconnects between what happens on paper and what happens when it comes time to do the installation.

As everyone knows, what may appear seamless on paper doesn’t always happen as smoothly in real-world applications. Oftentimes contractors have to make creative installation adjustments to ensure that the insulation can be applied properly within the confines of the specifications, space, and design.  To get a better perspective on the challenges installation contractors face in the field, we spoke with installation expert, Jeremie Overson, a professional contractor trainer in New Mexico who teaches contractors how to install and insulate mechanical and HVAC systems. Overson has multiple years of field experience working in and around structures under construction, and he has certainly seen his fair share of good and bad designs when it comes to insulating pipe systems. We asked him to share some of the common design oversights he’s seen that can cause major headaches for contractors during installation.  By highlighting these items, engineers can be mindful of these potential real-world pitfalls when designing their systems.

Three Design Considerations

1.    Insufficient Room: The desire to save space and ensure efficiency can cause things to get a little tight in pipe systems. This creates an environment where the contractor has to improvise in order to figure out how to install insulation to code and specification in spaces that are simply too small for the insulation to fit easily. Overson indicated that he frequently sees pipes placed right next to conduits, walls, and other pipe hangers. These narrow spaces can cause the insulation to be crushed during installation, which damages both the insulation’s integrity and its efficiency. Additionally, it can be difficult to achieve a proper vapor barrier when space is highly restricted. When designers fail to account for the real-world application and installation of the pipes and the insulation, the ramifications can ultimately affect the whole system, not just the contractors who are installing the insulation.

2.    Nominal Thickness: While this is a critical component to achieve maximum insulating value, designers occasionally do not account for the size of the outer diameter of the pipe in relation to the size of the inner diameter of the insulation. This is particularly relevant when using rigid insulations. When some pre-formed, rigid insulations have an inside diameter that is different than that of the pre-formed pipe covering, making the 2 fit together is not only challenging, but it can also potentially hurt the insulating value of the insulation. Overson explained that it can also be difficult to ensure that the final product has a clean, finished appearance when the contractors must make adjustments to the insulation in the field to ensure that it fits the pipe properly.

3.    Twisting, Turning Runs: It’s no small secret that straight pipe runs are the most contractor-friendly when it comes to installing insulation. When a system is designed with unnecessary turns, it can not only increase the installation time, but it can also negatively impact the system’s long-term performance. Overson indicated that in his tenure as an installer, he has heard several contractors complain about certain materials shrinking over time. Insulation shrinkage is concerning in any system, but in a system with frequent turns and contusions, the effects can be exacerbated by numerous areas of shrinkage throughout the entire run.

Conclusion

While both mechanical engineers and insulation contractors play a role in successfully completing a job, understanding the different demands of each position can ultimately streamline the process. When engineers are able to approach a job with a better understanding of how their insulation systems are implemented, they are able to create systems that are not only efficient when complete, but are also efficient to install. As the end game is to cost effectively maximize performance, taking a tactical approach that explores the downstream impacts of design can be a major step toward saving time, material, and money.

 

 

This article was published in the January 2017 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2017 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized  duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

IO161201_01

Generally, when the words duct insulation and acoustics appear in the same sentence, I usually think duct liner and sound absorption. If I am having a more cerebral moment, I may think insertion loss or friction loss. But that is not all there is to HVAC duct insulation. While duct liners certainly play an important role in providing thermal and acoustical insulation for HVAC systems, duct coverings or duct wraps also provide important alternatives.

In its simplest form, duct lining (traditionally fiber glass), would be installed in rectangular ducts as part of an automated process while the duct is being fabricated on a full coil line. This process has the lowest manufacturing costs, and you can make large quantities of duct quickly. The cost and speed advantages may be reduced because every transitional piece (elbows, reducers, and rectangular to round) must be fabricated and insulated manually. The biggest disadvantage of lining ducts with a coil line is that there are very few insulation materials that can be applied on coil lines. This means specified design criteria—such as closed cell or antimicrobial properties—may not be met with this limited selection. In these cases, the desired insulation material must be applied by hand, which is very labor intensive and increases the cost significantly. Round and oval ducts always must be insulated manually, which again, increases the difficulty and cost of insulating the duct.

There is also the issue of double wall duct construction for round or rectangular ducts. Double wall duct has the benefit of isolating (solid inner layer) or semi-isolating (perforated inner liner) the duct liner from the air stream, which is desirable for a number of reasons (e.g., keeping particulates out of the air stream and protecting the liner from harsh environments). However, double wall duct fabrication and field installation has its own set of disadvantages, such as added initial cost, added weight, and a more difficult installation. Additionally, a solid inner layer means that no sound absorption is taking place.

Why Insulate Ductwork?

It is important to note why ducts are insulated. Ducts can be insulated for sound control (acoustics), but they are also insulated for thermal performance, including controlling heat gain or loss, maintaining uniform heating or cooling throughout the air-handling system, and preventing condensation. In general, 2015 IECC energy codes can require R-values of 4.0 or 4.2 for duct passing through conditioned spaces, 6.0-8.0 for ducts passing through unconditioned spaces, and 8.0-12.0 for outdoor ductwork. These R-values can be obtained by either lining or wrapping the duct. Cost becomes a consideration when lining with thicker insulation as lining requires increased duct size to maintain an adequate cross-sectional area to maintain proper air flow. Wrapping, or a combination of wrapping and lining, may be more cost-effective alternatives.

Regardless of the R-value requirements, the insulation material used must have a maximum flame spread and smoke developed rating of 25 and 50, respectively, when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials (or equivalents UL 723 and NFPA 255); ASTM E2231 Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Pipe and Duct Insulation Materials to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics in the United States; CAN/ULC-S102 Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials and Assemblies; and/or CAN/ULC-S102.2 Surface Burning Characteristics of Flooring, Floor Covering and Miscellaneous Materials and Assemblies for materials that cannot be properly supported in a realistic test configuration or thermoplastic materials for Canada.

As previously mentioned, lining a duct is typically chosen over wrapping for acoustic performance, and acoustic insulation is typically equated with sound absorption. Open cell lining materials such as fibrous insulation or open cell foam insulation provide the best sound absorption performance when tested per ASTM C423 Standard Test Method for Sound Absorption and Sound Absorption Coefficients by the Reverberation Room Model. They also provide good initial R-values. Following is a non-technical summary of ASTM C423: the insulation material is placed on the floor of the test chamber, and then different frequencies of sound are thrown into the room. Sound that bounces back is measured, and the difference between “in and out” is what is absorbed. Using the standard calculation methods, performance can be summarized by a single numeric value, referred to as the noise reduction coefficient (NRC).

Lining materials can be compared for sound absorption performance by looking at the NRC of the materials at the same thickness (and mounting method). It is also good to look at the sound absorption at different frequencies, as the lower frequency performance is typically equated with reduction of mechanical noise, such as fan noise, which is the primary concern in air-handling systems.

In a properly designed air-handling system, open cell liners absorb sound very well, as do some closed-cell liners. The ostensible goal of absorption is to keep the air flowing quietly into the room. This, however, is an oversimplification, as there a many other variables that affect this, including diffuser types, duct size, and air flow rates. While many rooms have air flow that is barely audible or provides a pleasant white noise, when not properly insulated, the noise can rise to a level that disrupts room occupants. Noise that distracts the room occupants is not conducive to productivity, whether it is a work space, meeting room, or a classroom.

While sound absorption is important, there are other types of sound transmission that come into play in air-handling systems. Radiated noise or breakout noise is another form of noise that has to be considered. ASTM E90 Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions and Elements can be applicable when considering radiated or breakout noise. The non-technical description of ASTM E90 is as follows: there is a wall, and on one side of the wall is a known sound source, and on the other side of the wall is you (strategically positioned). What you hear is the transmitted sound. The ability of the wall to block the sound is represented by a numeric value referred to as the sound transmission coefficient (STC rating).

If a duct is passing through a room and it is loud due to air flow and/or mechanical noise (e.g., rattling), the end result can be the same disruptive noise that reduces productivity. In this type of application, a material with a good STC rating (such as a closed cell insulation or a mass loaded elastomer or vinyl) can reduce the noise to acceptable levels. But unlike sound absorption, where the duct is lined, sound transmission can be controlled through the use of duct lining or duct wrap.

Looking at Indoor Air Quality

So where or why do closed-cell lining materials, double wall construction, and duct coverings come in? The short answer is indoor air quality (IAQ). Lining a duct with any type of insulation has the potential to reduce indoor air quality for many reasons. Modern air-handling systems are complicated. They have the following parts:

•     Air intakes that can introduce humid air or wind-driven rain or snow into the system;
•     Cooling coils that can cause condensation; and
•     Heating coils and possibly UV sterilization equipment that can degrade certain liners, which impacts liner selection.

Moisture in an air-handling system can result in mold growth on or within the lining material. Moisture absorption can also reduce the R-value, which can result in condensation on the outer duct surface. This condensation can result in damage to other materials such as ceiling tiles, walls, and carpeting. There are also concerns about particulate matter, which can be a mechanical or respiratory irritant, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can also adversely affect indoor air quality.  In cases where IAQ is of the utmost importance, such as in hospitals, wrapping the ducts may be the preferred option.

Choosing Duct Insulation Materials

There are many considerations when specifying materials, and lining a duct is more complicated than wrapping a duct. Removing liner from the airstream addresses the IAQ concerns and makes duct cleaning easier. It also eliminates the need for double wall ducts and reduces the amount of sheet metal since the effective area of the duct is increased. On the other hand, design changes to the air-handling system are needed to control unwanted noise. Lower air velocities, bends in the ductwork, and mechanical sound attenuators can accomplish noise control in unlined ducts. But, attenuators are an additional cost and take up additional space. Additionally, energy code requirements and control of breakout noise have not been met.

A wide variety of materials can be used for duct wraps for both the insulation and jacketing. As duct wrap is installed on site, there are fewer concerns about insulation damage during shipping, on site storage, and installation (problems that can crop up with lined ducts). Repair of duct wrap is easier and less disruptive than repair of duct liner. Duct wrap takes up external duct space, so consideration must be given to provide adequate clearance for installation as well as room to work. Depending upon the scheduling, duct wrap can be susceptible to damage from other trades.

Duct wrap can take the form of rigid or flexible insulation materials, and the selection process should be based on a variety of conditions: round, oval, or rectangular ducts; indoor or outdoor installation; insulation R-value only or breakout noise control only, or both; and type of facility (e.g., office, residential, retail, school, hospital/medical building, cleanroom, food and beverage, or pharmaceutical production environment.) There are materials available to meet all of these needs.

Just like the duct wrap materials, there are a wide variety of jacketing options to meet project requirements. There are the “traditional”: metal jacketing, PVC and mastic, and mesh. For some applications the newer ASJ or FSK jackets may be adequate. Then, there are a variety of peel-and-stick type materials available from various manufacturers. There are insulation materials available in sheet and roll form with pre-applied jacketing, which can reduce field installation time (and cost) while allowing for installation over a wider variety of environmental conditions. The latter are important considerations since field insulation installation costs are typically higher than liner costs and installers often have little control over the working conditions, which can vary greatly by geography and season, regardless of whether installation is taking place indoors or outdoors.

Focus on System Needs

In selecting insulation and jacketing materials, it is important to select a system that will withstand the rigors of maintenance and modifications over the life of the building. While it would be ideal to go through all the aforementioned design and performance considerations before writing a project specification, unfortunately that may not be the case. However, it is important to develop an understanding of the owner/specifier’s goals and objectives and then offer an alternative that does a better job of meeting these goals or meets them more cost effectively. This is a competitive environment. Alternatives to traditional lined or wrapped metal duct are becoming acceptable options for a wider range of application, whether they are pre-insulated flexible duct, duct board, PVC, or phenolic duct.

Lining and wrapping both have their advantages and disadvantages, but with careful consideration and planning, each can provide a viable option to meet a project’s air-handling system needs.

 

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the December 2016 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2016 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

IO161204_01

An Insulation Energy Appraisal provides a data-backed analysis for facility/plant managers and owners to better understand how a properly selected, specified, designed, installed, and maintained mechanical insulation system can save money and enhance system performance. Whether the appraisal includes a system, a mechanical room, or the entire plant or campus, it will clearly illustrate the value of mechanical insulation.

For more than a decade, the National Insulation Association’s (NIA’s) insulation appraisal process quantifies the amount of energy and dollars a facility or process is losing with the current in-place insulation system and demonstrates how more efficient systems could:

•     Save energy;
•     Improve process control and efficiency;
•     Reduce fuel costs; and
•     Contribute to a cleaner environment through reduced emissions.

Through visual inspection, interviews, calculations, and analysis, an appraiser thoroughly evaluates a facility’s insulated and uninsulated systems (or the specific scope that has been identified). The thermal performance of insulated piping and equipment will be compared to any uninsulated or under-insulated piping and equipment in the facility. Based on the analysis, the appraiser will document the Btus/dollars/emissions that users are saving/losing with the current system, as well as the potential savings and reduced emissions an insulation upgrade, replacement, or maintenance program could provide. Additional upgrade benefits include reducing the strain of equipment and extending its life, or in some cases eliminating the need to purchase additional equipment to maintain system efficiency or temperature. The customized final report will identify recommendations for insulation optimization and calculate the potential return on investment (ROI).

Both new construction and existing buildings can benefit from an energy appraisal for uninsulated and under-insulated systems. For example, in new construction, items such as flange valves, flanged pairs, valves, and condensate receivers, and pumps, are routinely left uninsulated. Andrew Martin, President of I-Star Energy Solutions, a subsidiary of the Irex Contracting Group, conducts insulation energy audits and building envelope assessments throughout the United States. Andrew notes that in newer buildings when you add up the square footage of the surface area of those uninsulated items, it adds up to a significant amount of energy loss.

“We use infrared cameras on our assessments, and customers are shocked. . .  when we show them infrared/digital images and calculations and show them what the actual loss is. With new construction, they assume that’s the way it’s supposed to be, there’s nothing else that can be done with it,” Andrew adds.

When assessing older facilities or systems, I-Star sees the same things they see in new facilities, plus they see damaged insulation or places where the insulation has been removed for maintenance issues of some sort and never replaced. Andrew notes, “That’s where we find a lot more scope in the older buildings because of maintenance. For example, if a valve leaked, they would remove the wet insulation, but then never replace it.”

What to Expect during the Assessment

The first step in the appraisal process is an interview and discussion with the facility personnel who know the facility well. This will determine the scope of the appraisal, the scope of a facility’s energy usage and energy distribution systems, and the cost to operate. The appraiser will also review the facility layout and facility drawings, if available, and determine the major sources of energy serving the facility.

Often the facility walk-through takes place on a follow-up visit. During this step, the appraiser will measure and document all applicable pipes, ducts, and equipment, both insulated and uninsulated or damaged. The appraiser may also point out areas of concern with uninsulated areas or damaged insulation, such as personnel safety, regulatory compliance, corrosion under insulation, process control, or impact on adjacent equipment.

When I-Star conducts an assessment, they ask for the process temperatures of the systems, the hours of operation of the system, type of fuel, fuel costs, and the efficiency of the system. “Once we have those 5 things, we can do our calculations and report back to them,” Andrew says. Regarding how long the on-site assessment takes, it depends on the size of the building. “If we are in a hospital or larger building with 12 stories and multiple mechanical rooms, it could be multiple days. If there’s only 1 building, it may only take a few hours. We don’t tie anybody up—we are on our own,” Andrew notes.
Depending on the scope of the appraisal, the certified appraiser will look at:

•     Pipe and equipment sizes, locations, and geometries;
•     Types of installed insulation and jacketing or protective materials;
•     Condition of the current insulation systems;
•     Ambient temperature;
•     Process temperatures;
•     Wind velocity;
•     Design relative humidity values;
•     Annual hours of operation;
•     Scheduled downtimes;
•     Current thicknesses of insulation;
•     Energy sources;
•     Efficiency of each energy unit;
•     Type of energy used;
•     Cost of energy;
•     Process and instrument drawings (if available); and
•     Insulation specifications.

Creating a Customized Report

Once the appraiser has completed the interview with facility staff and the facility walk-through, he or she analyzes the data using resources—such as the insulation calculators developed by NIA and the National Institute of Building Sciences as part of the Mechanical Insulation Design Guide (www.insulation.org/resources/system-designmidg)—and the 3E Plus® program, which was developed by the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (NAIMA). Calculations include:

•     Heat gain or heat loss (actual fuel dollar loss);
•     Surface temperature requirements;
•     Condensation control;
•     Heat loss efficiencies versus bare pipe;
•     Payback period or Return on Investment (ROI); and
•     Emission reductions.

For I-Star, once they have gotten the customer information and completed their on-site assessment, they can generate the final report in approximately 10 business days.

What Will the Final Report Cover?

The appraiser will present a customized report and explain all financial savings information and energy and environmental data. Reports may also include infrared images that visually capture heat loss.

The final report will provide detailed and well-documented analysis, including:

•     Fuel cost savings with your current insulation system, potential upgrades for the system, and potential savings with an insulation upgrade;
•     Environmental impact in terms of reduced CO2, NOx, and other greenhouse gases resulting from increased energy savings and reduced fuel consumption;
•     Energy (Btu) loss/gain from uninsulated surfaces in the facility;
•     Energy (Btu) loss/gain from insulated surfaces in the facility; and
•     Btu or energy loss/gain from a pipe or vessel if it is insulated to the most thermally efficient, yet cost effective, thickness determined by the 3E Plus program.

The appraiser may identify recommendations based on the analysis and discuss the potential ROI from an insulation upgrade or replacement or from implementation of a timely and effective mechanical insulation maintenance program. If requested, the appraiser can also provide a professional estimate regarding any insulation recommendations.

Putting the Information into Action

When asked what customers typically do upon receiving their report, Andrew sees several typical responses. “Some say, ‘Wow, that’s a lot of loss. We’ll try to budget for it in the future.’ Those who are ready to take action may say, ‘This is great. I can take it up the ladder. I have the proof I need to get the funds.’” Andrew says people generally know there is a problem, but don’t know the extent of it.

When systems are properly insulated following an assessment, users will immediately notice a drop in their energy usage. Andrew added, another “thing everyone sees is a drop in temperature in the mechanical room itself just because when you’ve insulated all the steam systems or whatever it may be, the ambient temperature drops 10–15 degrees at times and that’s what the site personnel notice right on the spot.”

Andrew affirms, “Main thing, even though you may not think there’s an opportunity, at least allow someone who’s in the business of mechanical insulation and energy assessments to take a look instead of just saying, ‘We don’t have any energy loss here.’ There’s energy loss in every building.”

NIA currently has nearly 500 certified Insulation Energy Appraisers throughout the United States, and approximately 325 work for NIA member companies. Certified appraisers receive intensive training through NIA’s Insulation Energy Appraisal Program. They can provide an accurate appraisal of your current insulated systems and recommend the steps necessary to achieve the best energy and cost savings and emission reduction possible. To find a NIA Certified Insulation Energy Appraiser in your area, please visit http://tinyurl.com/jr4wzf8.

 

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the December 2016 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2016 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.

Trump

President-elect Donald Trump campaigned with an immigration enforcement-first message, focusing on border and E-Verify for employers, an overhaul of guest worker programs and rescinding some of President Barack Obama’s executive actions on immigration that allow for deferred deportation and work authorization for certain unauthorized immigrants. He also said he would implement a biometric entry-exit visa tracking system at the country’s ports of entry, suspend the issuance of visas to “any place where adequate screening cannot occur” and renegotiate or withdraw from key trade agreements.

“All indications to date are that President-elect Donald Trump will move forward with efforts to secure the border and focus on immigration worksite enforcement within his first 100 days,” said Chatrane Birbal, a government relations senior advisor at the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM).

“The president-elect had more detailed policy proposals in the immigration area than in any other during the campaign, and many restrictive proposals could be quickly implemented under Presidential Proclamation,” said Bill Stock, founding partner of Klasko Immigration Law Partners in the Philadelphia area and president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

DACA in the Crosshairs

Trump promised to unilaterally repeal President Obama’s immigration executive actions once sworn into office, and the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, established in 2012 and extended in 2014, is a likely early target for elimination.

DACA granted reprieve from deportation and provided work authorization to more than 740,000 young people whose families brought them to the United States as children. Trump also promised to end a 2014 expansion of that program to many parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents that was held up in court and never implemented.

“Employers should be prepared for their employees to lose their work permits, if they were granted under the DACA program,” Stock said. Employers are not normally required to re-verify employment eligibility during the validity period of a worker’s employment authorization but would be required to terminate any DACA workers once they had “actual or constructive knowledge” that the employee had lost his or her work permission, he explained.

The Return of Workplace Raids

Changes are likely to be aimed at illegal immigration at the outset, said Julie Pearl, CEO and managing attorney of the Pearl Law Group, based in the San Francisco Bay area.

“It is very likely that President-elect Trump will be able to increase immigration enforcement and removal numbers,” said Julie Myers Wood, CEO of investigative and compliance consultancy Guidepost Solutions and director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under former President George W. Bush. “Many of the efforts President Obama enacted which reduced enforcement were either by executive order or through internal policy shifts. The Trump administration can reverse these non-legislative policy decisions and begin ramping up enforcement.”

Wood said that worksite enforcement is one of the most likely opportunities the new administration will take action on, “given the magnet of illegal employment and the high level of publicity that often accompanies enforcement actions at workplaces.”

Workplace raids were a hallmark of the Bush administration, but the enforcement policy shifted under Obama in favor of Form I-9 paperwork audits.

Criminal charges can be brought against managers and business owners, and large numbers of unauthorized workers can be identified and potentially removed during worksite raids, but building criminal cases requires time and detailed investigative work, Wood explained.

Regardless of what Trump has planned for deportation, he will need to garner support from Congress to move forward, said Anton F. Mertens, a partner in the Atlanta office of Burr & Forman.

“To deport such a high volume of [undocumented workers] will take massive resources and time, so it is unlikely that this will happen anytime soon, if at all.”

Wood agreed that appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice will be critically important and a challenge for increased enforcement. “Currently the immigration courts have a significant backlog and immigrants can wait years for a hearing,” she said. “Adding more cases to the docket without adding more judges does not make any sense and will not support Trump’s goal of increased removal numbers.”

Work-authorized foreign nationals in the U.S. should not expect their immigration statuses to be affected anytime soon, Pearl said. “Major changes will take time—months, if not years—to complete. The regulations governing U.S. visas are codified as law, and implementing new laws requires substantial time from both the legislative and executive branches of government.”

However, Trump could bar any “alien or class of aliens” on the basis that he and his advisers deemed their entry “detrimental to the interests of the United States” under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Stock explained. That power is typically used for named individuals or human rights violators identified by the United Nations, but Trump could assert it, for example, toward H-1B visa holders earning less than the highest prevailing wage level, he said.

Mandatory E-Verify

Trump campaigned on setting up a nationwide E-Verify system, which would electronically screen all new hires for their eligibility to work in the United States.

“I expect the new administration to encourage more employers to use E-Verify under existing law, as well as ways to work with Congress in expanding mandatory use of E-Verify,” said Amy Peck, an attorney in the Omaha, Nebraska, office of Jackson Lewis.

But experts note that it would be very disruptive to impose an E-Verify mandate while a significant portion of the labor force is undocumented. “The key to reducing illegal immigration is a functioning employment verification system,” said Frank Sharry, the founder and executive director of America’s Voice, an immigration reform group. “But to do that with 8 million undocumented workers in the labor force will exacerbate all the problems we have with the status quo, driving people further underground, leading to worker exploitation, and disfavoring honest employers.”

It’s conceivable that a mandatory E-Verify program will garner support in the next Congress, Birbal said, even though it would require bipartisan congressional support, “which might be difficult to achieve given that Republicans have only a slim majority in the Senate—certainly not enough to curtail a Democratic-led Senate filibuster.”

The federal government already mandates certain federal contractors to use E-Verify. In addition, there are approximately 21 states and a number of localities that require the use of either E-Verify or a specified alternative for some or all employers.

 

Reprinted from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM); November, 14, 2016, with permission of the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). ©SHRM 2016. All rights reserved.

 

Copyright Statement

This article was published in the December 2016 issue of Insulation Outlook magazine. Copyright © 2016 National Insulation Association. All rights reserved. The contents of this website and Insulation Outlook magazine may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. Any unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited and would violate NIA’s copyright and may violate other copyright agreements that NIA has with authors and partners. Contact publisher@insulation.org to reprint or reproduce this content.